From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 11:45:46 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Future plans for sensors-detect Message-Id: <20080608134546.0981d8ae@hyperion.delvare> List-Id: References: <20080521114013.074cde02@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20080521114013.074cde02@hyperion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 26 May 2008 12:06:10 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > We already ship a default sensors.conf file which includes arbitrary > labels for many chips, which may or may not match the user's > motherboard. This is IMHO plain wrong, I agree with you that > unconfigured sensors are better than misconfigured sensors. I believe > that we should strip down sensors.conf.eg to only include labels which > we know are always correct (e.g. internal voltage labels.) This would > also make libsensors initialization much faster - for now we waste > users' time reading long configuration sections for chips they don't > even have. I don't have the time to work on this right now, but have created ticket #2333 so that we don't forget about it. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors