All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: linux acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
	"Accardi, Kristen C" <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>,
	Holger Macht <hmacht@suse.de>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] libata hotplug to align with dock driver
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 02:37:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080609013719.GA30665@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1212729788.25188.29.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>

On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 01:23:08PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:

>  	case ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST:
>  		ata_ehi_push_desc(ehi, "ACPI event");
> -
> -		if (!is_dock_event)
> -			break;
> -
> -		/* undock event - immediate unplug */
>  		ata_acpi_detach_device(ap, dev);

Ok, just to check that I've understood the other patches - this will 
only be called if the device has actually been removed, and not if you 
merely get an EJECT_REQUEST, right? An EJECT_REQUEST from a bay device 
should always just signal userspace, and never actually cause the device 
to be deleted. I don't really like the way that you're remapping event 
types inside the dock driver - it'd be cleaner if the per-driver 
handlers received ADD_DEVICE or REMOVE_DEVICE or something.

Other than that, this looks basically fine. I'll try to test it in the 
next couple of days.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-09  1:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-06  5:23 [PATCH 6/8] libata hotplug to align with dock driver Shaohua Li
2008-06-09  1:37 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2008-06-09 19:15   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-06-10  1:34   ` Shaohua Li
2008-06-10  8:15     ` Holger Macht
2008-06-10  8:27       ` Shaohua Li
2008-06-10 16:43         ` Holger Macht
2008-06-11  3:23           ` Shaohua Li
2008-06-11 12:52             ` Holger Macht
2008-06-12  1:23               ` Shaohua Li
2008-06-16 12:49                 ` Holger Macht
2008-06-18  4:02                   ` Shaohua Li
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-22  6:34 Shaohua Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080609013719.GA30665@srcf.ucam.org \
    --to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=hmacht@suse.de \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=kristen.c.accardi@intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.