From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karl =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hasselstr=F6m?= Subject: Re: [StGIT PATCH 3/5] Create a git.Branch class as ancestor of stack.Stack Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 09:07:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20080609070722.GA4100@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> References: <20080604210655.32531.82580.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20080604211334.32531.74258.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20080605070126.GC23209@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> <20080605130415.GB28995@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> <20080607090636.GB32647@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Catalin Marinas X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jun 09 09:08:38 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K5bUT-0006SU-QR for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:08:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754784AbYFIHHg convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2008 03:07:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752168AbYFIHHg (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2008 03:07:36 -0400 Received: from diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk ([80.68.90.142]:4749 "EHLO diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751886AbYFIHHg (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2008 03:07:36 -0400 Received: from kha by diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1K5bTO-000157-00; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 08:07:22 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Manual-Spam-Check: kha@treskal.com, clean User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 2008-06-08 23:16:02 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Hidden plan - once the new stgit.lib.git module is complete, we can > advertise it as a stand-alone object-oriented Git wrapper for Python > :-). Aren't there already a couple of those? :-) Though I agree that having such a future separation in mind is useful for making StGit nice and modular. Whether we actually carry it out in the end would depend on whether someone comes along and actually wants to use it, I guess. --=20 Karl Hasselstr=F6m, kha@treskal.com www.treskal.com/kalle