From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Moore To: Joshua Brindle Subject: Re: releasibility in mcstransd Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 16:50:59 -0400 Cc: SE Linux , Stephen Smalley References: <484D91BB.3080904@manicmethod.com> In-Reply-To: <484D91BB.3080904@manicmethod.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200806091650.59271.paul.moore@hp.com> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Monday 09 June 2008 4:25:31 pm Joshua Brindle wrote: > I am adding releasibility support to mcstransd and just wanted to see > if there were any comments or complaints to what I'm planning here. > > Rather than adding a generic prefix mechanism like the CMW encodings > I did something specific for releasibility, in setrans.conf: > > releasibility c100.c128 > > then encodings look like: > > s0:~c100 = rel_US > s0:~c101 = rel_Texas > > so a file with s0:c102.c128 would translate to s0:rel_US,rel_Texas. > > any comments? Does anyone think this is absolutely the wrong > approach? Unless there is a reason to do away with the existing CMW convention I think we should probably stick with it for no other reason than it is familiar to users migrating from CMW boxes to SELinux. -- paul moore linux @ hp -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.