All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Shen Feng <shen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fix the loop condition in ext4_mb_free_committed_blocks
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:23:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080611142356.GL8397@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <484F4CC1.3000109@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:55:45AM +0800, Shen Feng wrote:
> 
> Since md is freed before the do-while checks it,
> it's better to change it to while(1).

This actually isn't a bug, since there is no problem checking a
pointer that has been freed; its only *dereferencing* a pointer which
is bad.  That being said, md is never NULL at the end of the loop,
since in the middle of the loop is the only break condition:

	if (md == NULL)
		break;

So the patch saves a tiny amount of compiled code, but it isn't really
a fix in any way.

That being said, if we're going to make this sort of change, my
preference would be to use the more common C idiom:

	while (1) {
	      ...
	}

as opposed to

	do {
	      ...
	} while (1);

The former makes it quite clear that any exit from the loop is not
going to be coming from loop construct itself, but from any embedded
break statements inside the loop construct

Regards,

						- Ted

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-11 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-11  3:55 [PATCH] ext4: Fix the loop condition in ext4_mb_free_committed_blocks Shen Feng
2008-06-11 11:34 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-11 14:23 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2008-06-12  2:57   ` [PATCH V2] " Shen Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080611142356.GL8397@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shen@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.