All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: block merge conflicts
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:56:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080611195604.GE20851@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080611184729.978d62d2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

On Wed, Jun 11 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> [You win the prize for most conflicts in one day!  :-)]

Don't know whether to laugh or cry ;-)

> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got conflicts in the following
> files:
> 
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig	against the ftrace tree (trivial)
> arch/s390/kernel/time.c	against the s390 tree (function name change
> 			etr_sync_cpu_start -> clock_sync_cpu_start and
> 			etr_disable_sync_clock -> disable_sync_clock)
> arch/x86/kernel/apic_32.c	against the x86 tree (set_intr_gate ->
> 				alloc_intr_gate)
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perfctr-watchdog.c	against the x86 tree (trivial)
> arch/x86/kernel/i8259_64.c	against the x86 tree (set_intr_gate ->
> 				alloc_intr_gate and the part of the file was
> 				moved to irqinit_64.c)
> arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c	against the x86 tree (argument to smp_call_function
> 			changed)
> arch/x86/kernel/nmi_32.c	against the x86 tree (file was merged
> 				into nmi.c which merged correctly)
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c	against the kvm tree (trivial context and an
> 			on_each_cpu was removed)
> arch/x86/xen/smp.c	against the cpus4096 tree (for_each_cpu_mask ->
> 			for_each_cpu_mask_nr and context)
> include/asm-x86/hw_irq_32.h	against the x86 tree (merged into hw_irq.h)
> include/asm-x86/hw_irq_64.h	against the x86 tree (merged into hw_irq.h
> 				and irq_vectors.h)
> include/asm-x86/mach-default/irq_vectors.h	against the x86 tree (merged
> 						into asm-x86/irq_vectors.h)
> include/asm-x86/mach-voyager/irq_vectors.h	against the x86 tree (merged
> 						into asm-x86/irq_vectors.h)
> (There was a bug in the above file - QIC_CALL_FUNCTION_CPI is used twice
> instead of being QIC_CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_CPI the second time)
> kernel/Makefile		against the sched tree (trivial context)
> kernel/rcupdate.c	against the sched tree (changed parameter to
> 			on_each_cpu)
> net/iucv/iucv.c		against the net tree (trivial context)
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c	against the kvm tree (trivial context)
> 
> 
> So you can see that there are some challenges there.  I tried to fix it
> all up as well as I could but no guarantees.
> 
> However the powerpc ppc64_defconfig build failed immediately like this:
> 
> In file included from include/linux/smp.h:29,
>                  from include/linux/topology.h:33,
>                  from include/linux/mmzone.h:683,
>                  from include/linux/gfp.h:4,
>                  from include/linux/slab.h:12,
>                  from include/linux/percpu.h:5,
>                  from include2/asm/time.h:18,
>                  from include2/asm/cputime.h:26,
>                  from include/linux/sched.h:66,
>                  from arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c:17:
> include2/asm/smp.h: In function 'arch_send_call_function_single_ipi':
> include2/asm/smp.h:121: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> include2/asm/smp.h: In function 'arch_send_call_function_ipi':
> include2/asm/smp.h:129: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> 
> and it went downhill from there - smp_opts_t is defined in asm/machdep.h
> but including that in asm/smp.h only gets us more errors.
> 
> So I have reverted the block tree for today, sorry.

No worries, I'll make sure to compile test everything again and send you
a note. I had half-expected the move of the arch defines from
linux/smp.h to asm/smp.h to cause a problem or two, I'll double check
everything.

I'll send you a note tomorrow when things are going.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-11 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-11  8:47 linux-next: block merge conflicts Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-11 19:56 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2008-06-12  1:08   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-12 13:26     ` Jens Axboe
2008-06-12 13:32       ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-13  7:22 ` linux-next: manual merge of block tree Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-13  7:48   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080611195604.GE20851@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.