diff for duplicates of <200806131835.15829.rjw@sisk.pl> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index fa249fd..c15dfd8 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ On Friday, 13 of June 2008, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > testing between 2 machines. I have created the Bugzilla entry at -http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id\x10908 +http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10908 for this bug. Can you add yourself to the CC list in there, please? > Below is the log. @@ -36,28 +36,28 @@ for this bug. Can you add yourself to the CC list in there, please? > > Call Trace: > [<a000000100014de0>] show_stack+0x40/0xa0 -> spà000003d45379c0 bspà000003d4531440 +> sp=e0000003d45379c0 bsp=e0000003d4531440 > [<a0000001000156f0>] show_regs+0x850/0x8a0 -> spà000003d4537b90 bspà000003d45313e0 +> sp=e0000003d4537b90 bsp=e0000003d45313e0 > [<a000000100038d10>] die+0x230/0x360 -> spà000003d4537b90 bspà000003d4531398 +> sp=e0000003d4537b90 bsp=e0000003d4531398 > [<a00000010005cec0>] ia64_do_page_fault+0x8e0/0xa40 -> spà000003d4537b90 bspà000003d4531348 +> sp=e0000003d4537b90 bsp=e0000003d4531348 > [<a00000010000b120>] ia64_leave_kernel+0x0/0x280 -> spà000003d4537c20 bspà000003d4531348 +> sp=e0000003d4537c20 bsp=e0000003d4531348 > [<a00000010087a4b0>] tcp_rcv_established+0x1450/0x16e0 -> spà000003d4537df0 bspà000003d45312d8 +> sp=e0000003d4537df0 bsp=e0000003d45312d8 > [<a000000100888370>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x70/0x500 -> spà000003d4537df0 bspà000003d4531298 +> sp=e0000003d4537df0 bsp=e0000003d4531298 > [<a00000010088cd30>] tcp_v4_rcv+0xfb0/0x1060 -> spà000003d4537e00 bspà000003d4531248 +> sp=e0000003d4537e00 bsp=e0000003d4531248 > > > > As a matter of fact, kernel paniced at statement -> "queue->rskq_accept_tail->dl_next = req" in function reqsk_queue_add, because -> queue->rskq_accept_tail is NULL. The call chain is: -> tcp_rcv_established => inet_csk_reqsk_queue_add => reqsk_queue_add. +> "queue->rskq_accept_tail->dl_next = req" in function reqsk_queue_add, because +> queue->rskq_accept_tail is NULL. The call chain is: +> tcp_rcv_established => inet_csk_reqsk_queue_add => reqsk_queue_add. > > As I was running an initial specweb2005(configured 3500 sessions) testing between > 2 machines, there were lots of failure and many network connections were diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 4e60a34..6dbe581 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ "ref\01213345160.25608.3.camel@ymzhang\0" "From\0Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>\0" "Subject\0Re: IPF Montvale machine panic when running a network-relevent testing\0" - "Date\0Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:35:15 +0000\0" + "Date\0Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:35:15 +0200\0" "To\0Zhang" " Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>\0" "Cc\0netdev@vger.kernel.org" @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ "> testing between 2 machines.\n" "\n" "I have created the Bugzilla entry at\n" - "http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id\020908\n" + "http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10908\n" "for this bug. Can you add yourself to the CC list in there, please?\n" "\n" "> Below is the log.\n" @@ -47,28 +47,28 @@ "> \n" "> Call Trace:\n" "> [<a000000100014de0>] show_stack+0x40/0xa0\n" - "> sp\303\240000003d45379c0 bsp\303\240000003d4531440\n" + "> sp=e0000003d45379c0 bsp=e0000003d4531440\n" "> [<a0000001000156f0>] show_regs+0x850/0x8a0\n" - "> sp\303\240000003d4537b90 bsp\303\240000003d45313e0\n" + "> sp=e0000003d4537b90 bsp=e0000003d45313e0\n" "> [<a000000100038d10>] die+0x230/0x360\n" - "> sp\303\240000003d4537b90 bsp\303\240000003d4531398\n" + "> sp=e0000003d4537b90 bsp=e0000003d4531398\n" "> [<a00000010005cec0>] ia64_do_page_fault+0x8e0/0xa40\n" - "> sp\303\240000003d4537b90 bsp\303\240000003d4531348\n" + "> sp=e0000003d4537b90 bsp=e0000003d4531348\n" "> [<a00000010000b120>] ia64_leave_kernel+0x0/0x280\n" - "> sp\303\240000003d4537c20 bsp\303\240000003d4531348\n" + "> sp=e0000003d4537c20 bsp=e0000003d4531348\n" "> [<a00000010087a4b0>] tcp_rcv_established+0x1450/0x16e0\n" - "> sp\303\240000003d4537df0 bsp\303\240000003d45312d8\n" + "> sp=e0000003d4537df0 bsp=e0000003d45312d8\n" "> [<a000000100888370>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x70/0x500\n" - "> sp\303\240000003d4537df0 bsp\303\240000003d4531298\n" + "> sp=e0000003d4537df0 bsp=e0000003d4531298\n" "> [<a00000010088cd30>] tcp_v4_rcv+0xfb0/0x1060\n" - "> sp\303\240000003d4537e00 bsp\303\240000003d4531248\n" + "> sp=e0000003d4537e00 bsp=e0000003d4531248\n" "> \n" "> \n" "> \n" "> As a matter of fact, kernel paniced at statement\n" - "> \"queue->rskq_accept_tail->dl_next = req\" in function \303\257\302\273\302\277reqsk_queue_add, because\n" - "> \303\257\302\273\302\277queue->rskq_accept_tail is NULL. The call chain is:\n" - "> \303\257\302\273\302\277\303\257\302\273\302\277tcp_rcv_established => inet_csk_reqsk_queue_add => reqsk_queue_add.\n" + "> \"queue->rskq_accept_tail->dl_next = req\" in function \357\273\277reqsk_queue_add, because\n" + "> \357\273\277queue->rskq_accept_tail is NULL. The call chain is:\n" + "> \357\273\277\357\273\277tcp_rcv_established => inet_csk_reqsk_queue_add => reqsk_queue_add.\n" "> \n" "> As I was running an initial specweb2005(configured 3500 sessions) testing between\n" "> 2 machines, there were lots of failure and many network connections were\n" @@ -81,4 +81,4 @@ "Thanks,\n" Rafael -cfa216221b6066e25c39fb677a1c34c0cb4544f4e5b1d0a98cfa11689cc5518a +7778db14e2ab05dff8db078b6ed72c84a0dbd2100bc9650fbcff734d022ca1b7
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index fa249fd..12bc761 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ On Friday, 13 of June 2008, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > testing between 2 machines. I have created the Bugzilla entry at -http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id\x10908 +http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10908 for this bug. Can you add yourself to the CC list in there, please? > Below is the log. @@ -36,28 +36,28 @@ for this bug. Can you add yourself to the CC list in there, please? > > Call Trace: > [<a000000100014de0>] show_stack+0x40/0xa0 -> spà000003d45379c0 bspà000003d4531440 +> sp=e0000003d45379c0 bsp=e0000003d4531440 > [<a0000001000156f0>] show_regs+0x850/0x8a0 -> spà000003d4537b90 bspà000003d45313e0 +> sp=e0000003d4537b90 bsp=e0000003d45313e0 > [<a000000100038d10>] die+0x230/0x360 -> spà000003d4537b90 bspà000003d4531398 +> sp=e0000003d4537b90 bsp=e0000003d4531398 > [<a00000010005cec0>] ia64_do_page_fault+0x8e0/0xa40 -> spà000003d4537b90 bspà000003d4531348 +> sp=e0000003d4537b90 bsp=e0000003d4531348 > [<a00000010000b120>] ia64_leave_kernel+0x0/0x280 -> spà000003d4537c20 bspà000003d4531348 +> sp=e0000003d4537c20 bsp=e0000003d4531348 > [<a00000010087a4b0>] tcp_rcv_established+0x1450/0x16e0 -> spà000003d4537df0 bspà000003d45312d8 +> sp=e0000003d4537df0 bsp=e0000003d45312d8 > [<a000000100888370>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x70/0x500 -> spà000003d4537df0 bspà000003d4531298 +> sp=e0000003d4537df0 bsp=e0000003d4531298 > [<a00000010088cd30>] tcp_v4_rcv+0xfb0/0x1060 -> spà000003d4537e00 bspà000003d4531248 +> sp=e0000003d4537e00 bsp=e0000003d4531248 > > > > As a matter of fact, kernel paniced at statement -> "queue->rskq_accept_tail->dl_next = req" in function reqsk_queue_add, because -> queue->rskq_accept_tail is NULL. The call chain is: -> tcp_rcv_established => inet_csk_reqsk_queue_add => reqsk_queue_add. +> "queue->rskq_accept_tail->dl_next = req" in function reqsk_queue_add, because +> queue->rskq_accept_tail is NULL. The call chain is: +> tcp_rcv_established => inet_csk_reqsk_queue_add => reqsk_queue_add. > > As I was running an initial specweb2005(configured 3500 sessions) testing between > 2 machines, there were lots of failure and many network connections were @@ -69,3 +69,7 @@ for this bug. Can you add yourself to the CC list in there, please? Thanks, Rafael +-- +To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in +the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org +More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 4e60a34..1e2c4bb 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ "ref\01213345160.25608.3.camel@ymzhang\0" "From\0Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>\0" "Subject\0Re: IPF Montvale machine panic when running a network-relevent testing\0" - "Date\0Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:35:15 +0000\0" + "Date\0Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:35:15 +0200\0" "To\0Zhang" " Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>\0" "Cc\0netdev@vger.kernel.org" @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ "> testing between 2 machines.\n" "\n" "I have created the Bugzilla entry at\n" - "http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id\020908\n" + "http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10908\n" "for this bug. Can you add yourself to the CC list in there, please?\n" "\n" "> Below is the log.\n" @@ -47,28 +47,28 @@ "> \n" "> Call Trace:\n" "> [<a000000100014de0>] show_stack+0x40/0xa0\n" - "> sp\303\240000003d45379c0 bsp\303\240000003d4531440\n" + "> sp=e0000003d45379c0 bsp=e0000003d4531440\n" "> [<a0000001000156f0>] show_regs+0x850/0x8a0\n" - "> sp\303\240000003d4537b90 bsp\303\240000003d45313e0\n" + "> sp=e0000003d4537b90 bsp=e0000003d45313e0\n" "> [<a000000100038d10>] die+0x230/0x360\n" - "> sp\303\240000003d4537b90 bsp\303\240000003d4531398\n" + "> sp=e0000003d4537b90 bsp=e0000003d4531398\n" "> [<a00000010005cec0>] ia64_do_page_fault+0x8e0/0xa40\n" - "> sp\303\240000003d4537b90 bsp\303\240000003d4531348\n" + "> sp=e0000003d4537b90 bsp=e0000003d4531348\n" "> [<a00000010000b120>] ia64_leave_kernel+0x0/0x280\n" - "> sp\303\240000003d4537c20 bsp\303\240000003d4531348\n" + "> sp=e0000003d4537c20 bsp=e0000003d4531348\n" "> [<a00000010087a4b0>] tcp_rcv_established+0x1450/0x16e0\n" - "> sp\303\240000003d4537df0 bsp\303\240000003d45312d8\n" + "> sp=e0000003d4537df0 bsp=e0000003d45312d8\n" "> [<a000000100888370>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x70/0x500\n" - "> sp\303\240000003d4537df0 bsp\303\240000003d4531298\n" + "> sp=e0000003d4537df0 bsp=e0000003d4531298\n" "> [<a00000010088cd30>] tcp_v4_rcv+0xfb0/0x1060\n" - "> sp\303\240000003d4537e00 bsp\303\240000003d4531248\n" + "> sp=e0000003d4537e00 bsp=e0000003d4531248\n" "> \n" "> \n" "> \n" "> As a matter of fact, kernel paniced at statement\n" - "> \"queue->rskq_accept_tail->dl_next = req\" in function \303\257\302\273\302\277reqsk_queue_add, because\n" - "> \303\257\302\273\302\277queue->rskq_accept_tail is NULL. The call chain is:\n" - "> \303\257\302\273\302\277\303\257\302\273\302\277tcp_rcv_established => inet_csk_reqsk_queue_add => reqsk_queue_add.\n" + "> \"queue->rskq_accept_tail->dl_next = req\" in function \357\273\277reqsk_queue_add, because\n" + "> \357\273\277queue->rskq_accept_tail is NULL. The call chain is:\n" + "> \357\273\277\357\273\277tcp_rcv_established => inet_csk_reqsk_queue_add => reqsk_queue_add.\n" "> \n" "> As I was running an initial specweb2005(configured 3500 sessions) testing between\n" "> 2 machines, there were lots of failure and many network connections were\n" @@ -79,6 +79,10 @@ "> lock_sock also accesses sk->sk_lock.slock, it looks like there is a race.\n" "\n" "Thanks,\n" - Rafael + "Rafael\n" + "--\n" + "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-ia64\" in\n" + "the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n" + More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -cfa216221b6066e25c39fb677a1c34c0cb4544f4e5b1d0a98cfa11689cc5518a +198736b1b39d6c286ab8a91af712856f748f6445ec78ee9171cee1abbeedaed1
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.