From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: VCPU cores & sockets Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:03:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20080617160318.GC5994@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <4857DEAE.9070202@virtualiron.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4857DEAE.9070202@virtualiron.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ben Guthro Cc: xen-devel , Keir Fraser , Jean Guyader List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ben Guthro, le Tue 17 Jun 2008 11:56:30 -0400, a écrit : > > >I argue against further redundant domain config options. > > > > -- Keir > > > While I would normally agree with this statement... > knowing that you must set CPUID.4:EAX[31:26] to cores + 1 (but only if > CPUID.1:EDX[28]==1) is not exactly user friendly... Maybe we could add a little tool that computes the CPUIDs you want? Samuel