From: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] - Increase MAX_APICS for very large x86_64 configs
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:02:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080619150209.GA9295@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080619103242.GA13213@elte.hu>
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:32:42PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> > > The patch has no effect on any 32-bit kernel. It adds ~4k to the
> > > size of 64-bit kernels but only if NR_CPUS > 255.
> > >
> > > This is a repost of an earlier patch (4/16) that was implicated in a
> > > random-qa failure. I have not been able to reproduce the failure
> > > using the same boot args & config. Best guess is that some other
> > > patch caused random data corruption & this patch was a victim.
> >
> > i have just re-tested the previously failing config on tip/master:
> >
> > http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Thu_Apr_17_10_17_14_CEST_2008.bad
> > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
> >
> > and the good news is that it does not crash on bootup anymore. Perhaps
> > one of Mike's fixes/improvements did the trick?
>
> unfortunately it didnt last long, -tip randconfig auto-testing found
> that your patch causes a bootup crash:
>
I built a "git-checkout -b tip-latest tip/auto-latest" tree but get compile errors.
Is this the right tree??
Have you seen this before:
In file included from arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c:13:
include/linux/acpi.h:97:1: warning: "NR_NODE_MEMBLKS" redefined
In file included from include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h:59,
from include/acpi/platform/acenv.h:140,
from include/acpi/acpi.h:54,
from include/linux/acpi.h:39,
from arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c:13:
include/asm/acpi.h:165:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c:101: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'do'
arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c:101: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'while'
arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c:108: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'do'
arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c:108: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'while'
arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c:211: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'do'
arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c:211: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'while'
...
--- jack
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-19 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-16 17:09 [PATCH] - Increase MAX_APICS for very large x86_64 configs Jack Steiner
2008-06-19 10:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-19 10:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-19 15:02 ` Jack Steiner [this message]
2008-06-19 15:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-19 15:19 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080619150209.GA9295@sgi.com \
--to=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.