From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: sparc64 build failure Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:11:16 +1000 Message-ID: <20080620111116.28e2def2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20080620104352.1358ff2a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080619.175520.231354507.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__20_Jun_2008_11_11_16_+1000_5bk5PahV1sBQ4W58" Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:57992 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751471AbYFTBLd (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:11:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080619.175520.231354507.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Miller Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org --Signature=_Fri__20_Jun_2008_11_11_16_+1000_5bk5PahV1sBQ4W58 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:55:20 -0700 (PDT) David Miller = wrote: > > From: Stephen Rothwell > Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:43:52 +1000 >=20 > > Yesterday's linux-next build (sparc64 allmodconfig) failed like this: >=20 > Sam knowingly added this problem :-) So, I assume he has "cunning scheme" to fix this soon ... --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Fri__20_Jun_2008_11_11_16_+1000_5bk5PahV1sBQ4W58 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkhbA7QACgkQTgG2atn1QN9kHQCff6HUvDI/ByXTD6+tKO9qRE2/ FLQAoIlCjthZhH+ObGYTVA5ImYFJLGdo =UYJu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__20_Jun_2008_11_11_16_+1000_5bk5PahV1sBQ4W58--