From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 13: IO APIC breakage on HP nx6325
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:59:27 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080620185927.GA11597@cvg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0806182308190.7802@cliff.in.clinika.pl>
[Maciej W. Rozycki - Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:36:16PM +0100]
| On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
|
| > | 1. The 8259A interrupt actually escapes to the CPU somehow and is handled
| > | as an ExtINTA interrupt. This would make the code in check_timer()
| > | decide it has found a working configuration, while actually it has been
| > | fooled.
| >
| > Maciej, that is why we get 'received illegal vector'?
| >
| > [ 129.092151] APIC error on CPU1: 00(40)
|
| No, but that's an interesting observation, thank you -- well spotted!
|
| ExtINTA stands for an "External INTA cycle" which is passed through from
| the CPU down to the system bus instead of being intercepted by the local
| APIC unit as usually. In response to the INTA cycle one of the 8259A
| chips (either the master or the slave, depending on the source of the
| interrupt selected for handling) supplies the vector directly to the CPU
| through PCI (or whatever kind of bus links the legacy bridge with the host
| bridge) and then the FSB. Therefore the vector bypasses all the APIC
| circuitry and cannot result in an APIC error interrupt.
|
| Instead the message quoted means an APIC input is misprogrammed
| somewhere. This error happens if an interrupt is signalled to an unmasked
| APIC input which uses the Fixed or Lowest-Priority delivery mode and its
| vector implies priority below the minimum permitted, that is in the range
| from 0 to 15.
|
| We have code already in place in io_apic_{32,64}.c that can be used to
| find out the offender with a piece of code like this (#if 0 has to be
| deactivated for this to work and they may be bit rot bugs to be fixed):
|
| int __init all_pic_dump(void)
| {
| int v = apic_verbosity;
|
| apic_verbosity = APIC_DEBUG;
| print_IO_APIC();
| print_all_local_APICs();
| print_PIC();
| apic_verbosity = v;
|
| return 0;
| }
|
| late_initcall(all_pic_dump);
|
| if somebody is willing to aid with debugging this problem.
|
| Maciej
|
Thanks, Maciej,
i would really like to help... but I can't even hit this
bug on my laptop :(
- Cyrill -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-20 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-13 13:22 linux-next: Tree for June 13 Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-13 17:13 ` linux-next: Tree for June 13 (XEN) Randy Dunlap
2008-06-13 22:16 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-14 20:31 ` Jens Axboe
2008-06-14 23:13 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-06-15 6:11 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-16 19:30 ` Jens Axboe
2008-06-16 20:40 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-13 22:58 ` linux-next: Tree for June 13 (x86_64: panic) Randy Dunlap
2008-06-14 8:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-14 23:15 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-06-15 16:33 ` linux-next: Tree for June 13 (soft lockup) Randy Dunlap
2008-06-15 18:31 ` linux-next: Tree for June 13 Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <200806160314.49489.rjw@sisk.pl>
2008-06-16 2:45 ` linux-next: Tree for June 13: IO APIC breakage on HP nx6325 Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-16 13:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-16 15:39 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-16 22:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-16 23:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-17 7:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-06-17 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-17 22:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-17 22:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-18 8:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-06-18 12:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-06-18 14:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-18 14:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-18 15:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-06-21 22:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-18 13:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-18 13:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-17 20:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-17 21:19 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-17 21:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-17 22:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-18 4:02 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-18 19:06 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-06-18 22:36 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-20 18:59 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2008-06-20 20:44 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-18 22:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-18 23:39 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-19 0:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-20 0:35 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-20 11:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-20 11:57 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-06-20 12:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-20 12:27 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-06-21 1:09 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-21 1:40 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-06-21 2:41 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-21 12:38 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-06-26 19:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-27 0:06 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-29 14:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-29 19:05 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-29 19:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-29 19:56 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-29 20:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-29 20:14 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-29 23:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-30 0:45 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-30 0:47 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-06-30 1:39 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-30 9:24 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-02 1:19 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-30 10:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-02 1:48 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-07-02 9:35 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-29 22:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-29 22:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-30 1:00 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-30 9:06 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-06-30 15:29 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-30 15:35 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-06-29 19:23 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-06-29 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-29 20:03 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-29 20:07 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-06-29 20:16 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-24 9:15 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-26 8:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-27 1:53 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-07-08 12:48 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-21 1:49 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-19 9:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-19 18:17 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-20 10:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 13:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-06-20 20:56 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-17 0:08 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080620185927.GA11597@cvg \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.