Re: linux-next build poblems

[Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>]

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 09:32:49PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:21:56PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > 
> > > I need to work out something.
> > > But my first attemps failed miserably and I will stop for now
> > > as I have some day-time job stuff to be done.
> > > Travelling for a few days from now one so I cannot do anything
> > > until the weekend.
> > I came up with the following fix.
> > And I fixed an arm tool chain for my box so I could check it.
> > 
> > We can now build an arm kernel (or at least the first steps).
> > 
> > I have pushed it out to kbuild-next.git.
> > And I will redo the patch series later so we do not bisect break arm etc.
> 
> Silly question, but what's wrong with restoring the symlink in the
> build include/ directory?
The asm-offsets.h file should always be generated in the same directory.
And that is include/asm-$ARCH today.

But if we move include/asm-$ARCH to arch/$ARCH/include then that directory
no longer exists.
And I wanted to avoid adding generated files to arch/$ARCH/include
so the obvious choice was to generate the asm-offsets.h file in
include/asm which works in make O=... and 'normal' builds.

And because I were facing problams when asm was a symlink I
went for the solution with asm being a directory.
But then arm creates asm-arm as a directory too.

So I can try to see of I can make asm a symlink again
to asm-$ARCH. Adding a include3 directory is not my preferred
solution.

	Sam