All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: don't walk tables if ACPI was disabled
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:41:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080624114139.GC21890@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19f34abd0806210119o64a1c9ban78710651a01530cf@mail.gmail.com>


* Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So I guess this function, pnpbios_init() needs the check as well. In
> > fact, it has this:
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PNPACPI
> >        if (!acpi_disabled && !pnpacpi_disabled) {
> >                pnpbios_disabled = 1;
> >                printk(KERN_INFO "PnPBIOS: Disabled by ACPI PNP\n");
> >                return -ENODEV;
> >        }
> > #endif                          /* CONFIG_ACPI */
> >
> > ...I guess that should be changed to say if (acpi_disabled ||
> > pnpacpi_disabled)? Or... I don't understand the purpose of the
> > original test. But it seems to be there since the beginning of time
> > (or, well, v2.6.12-rc2).
> 
> Nope. I found the introduction of the change in the historical git repository:
> 
> commit 4723ebe898a32262ed49fe677897ccea47e72ff4
> Author: Adam Belay <ambx1@neo.rr.com>
> Date:   Sun Oct 24 15:07:32 2004 -0400
> 
>     [PNPBIOS] disable if ACPI is active
> 
>     As further ACPI pnp functionaility is implemented it is no longer
>     safe to run ACPI and PNPBIOS concurrently.
> 
>     We therefore take the following approach:
>     - attempt to enable ACPI support
>     - if ACPI fails (blacklist etc.) enable pnpbios support
>     - if ACPI support is not compiled in the kernel enable pnpbios support
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Adam Belay <ambx1@neo.rr.com>
> 
> and now I understand the purpose of the check; pnpbios does not depend 
> on ACPI; ACPI/pnpacpi is incompatible with pnpbios.

wow, rather old bug - i guess lockdep made it more visible.

> Yet it remains a fact that pnpbios will discover devices which then 
> ACPI code uses erroneously. Which means that my original fix for Ingo 
> probably is the right one after all. Should I submit another patch 
> which does the right thing for everything under drivers/acpi/, or can 
> you do it on your own? :-)

i havent seen the warning reappear with your fix after thousands of 
bootups - so i guess we can consider it fixed.

Len, please consider the patch below. (it's in tip/out-of-tree)

	Ingo

----------------->
commit acc85833791a5d8f84b8df601afc1cc44568dd18
Author: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri Jun 20 15:56:40 2008 +0200

    ACPI: don't walk tables if ACPI was disabled
    
    Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > -tip auto-testing started triggering this spinlock corruption message
    > yesterday:
    >
    > [    3.976213] calling  acpi_rtc_init+0x0/0xd3
    > [    3.980213] ACPI Exception (utmutex-0263): AE_BAD_PARAMETER, Thread F7C50000 could not acquire Mutex [3] [20080321]
    > [    3.992213] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, swapper/1
    > [    3.992213]  lock: c2508dc4, .magic: 00000000, .owner: swapper/1, .owner_cpu: 0
    
    This is apparently because some parts of ACPI, including mutexes, are not
    initialized when acpi=off is passed to the kernel.
    
    Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
    Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
    Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
    Cc: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
    Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
    Cc: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
    Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/glue.c b/drivers/acpi/glue.c
index b4d4ce0..c3e1eeb 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/glue.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/glue.c
@@ -334,6 +334,9 @@ static int __init acpi_rtc_init(void)
 {
 	struct device *dev = get_rtc_dev();
 
+	if (acpi_disabled)
+		return 0;
+
 	if (dev) {
 		rtc_wake_setup();
 		rtc_info.wake_on = rtc_wake_on;
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/namespace/nsxfeval.c b/drivers/acpi/namespace/nsxfeval.c
index a8d5491..c274d1d 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/namespace/nsxfeval.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/namespace/nsxfeval.c
@@ -391,6 +391,9 @@ acpi_walk_namespace(acpi_object_type type,
 
 	ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(acpi_walk_namespace);
 
+	if (acpi_disabled)
+		return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NO_NAMESPACE);
+
 	/* Parameter validation */
 
 	if ((type > ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_MAX) || (!max_depth) || (!user_function)) {

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-24 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-20  9:52 [bug, acpi] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, swapper/1, ACPI Exception (utmutex-0263): AE_BAD_PARAMETER Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 13:11 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-20 13:56 ` [PATCH] ACPI: don't walk tables if ACPI was disabled Vegard Nossum
2008-06-20 14:22   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-25  2:34     ` [PATCH] ACPI: add standard linux WARN() output to ACPI warnings Len Brown
2008-06-25  2:49       ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-06-25  3:10         ` Len Brown
2008-06-26  3:57           ` Len Brown
2008-06-20 19:00   ` [PATCH] ACPI: don't walk tables if ACPI was disabled Len Brown
2008-06-20 20:40     ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-20 21:27       ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-21  8:19         ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-24 11:41           ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-06-24 11:52             ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-24 15:22               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-06-25  1:37               ` Zhao Yakui
2008-06-25 15:08                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-06-26  3:02                   ` Zhao Yakui
2008-06-26 16:44                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-06-25  2:41             ` Len Brown
2008-06-25  7:07               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-25  3:07   ` Len Brown
2008-06-25  3:07   ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: add standard linux WARN() output to ACPI warnings Len Brown
2008-06-25  3:07     ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: add WARN_ON(acpi_disabled) Len Brown
2008-06-25  3:07     ` [PATCH 3/4] dock: bay: Don't call acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled Len Brown
2008-06-25  3:07     ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: don't walk tables if ACPI was disabled Len Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080624114139.GC21890@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=astarikovskiy@suse.de \
    --cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
    --cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.