From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:33:20 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200806251833.21248.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080625074733.GA16692@elte.hu>
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 17:47:33 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Hi Rusty,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the rr tree got a conflict in
> > kernel/stop_machine.c between commit
> > 961ccddd59d627b89bd3dc284b6517833bbdf25d ("sched: add new API
> > sched_setscheduler_nocheck: add a flag to control access") from the
> > sched tree (which is also in the rr tree) and commit
> > 179da75b083a098ba6192c0900611a92091abfc9 ("stop_machine:simplify")
> > from the rr tree.
> >
> > I just took the rr tree version since the former is in both trees.
>
> Rusty, there's a new -tip toy/feature i've applied when creating that
> commit 2 days ago, to eliminate this (predictable) conflict.
>
> Since this is a scheduler infrastructure change, i've put this change
> into a separate topic branch in -tip:
>
> tip/sched/new-API-sched_setscheduler
>
> This new topic branch is based off upstream -git so you can pick up that
> change alone via a single git-pull, without picking up any other
> scheduler changes. (any further enhancements to that change should be
> done in that topic branches as well)
>
> This topic is integrated into tip/auto-sched-next, so any changes to the
> topic will be propagated into linux-next as well. I think this is the
> right model for doing infrastructure changes - separating them into
> standalone trees so that other subsystem maintainers can pull them when
> they run into conflicts.
>
> Please use that commit and remove 179da75b083a09 so that there's no
> overlap in the sha1 space and no conflicts. -tip can be picked up via:
> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README .
That would probably work, but I don't use git.
Stephen's already resolved it; AFAICT getting the exact same patch from two
places is not a real problem for him anyway.
In this case, I'm tempted to just throw the stop_machine patch into your tree;
that's the only reason I care about this change. I haven't done that yet
because I suspect that I broke hotplug CPU.
Cheers,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-25 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-25 6:27 linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-25 7:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-25 8:33 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-25 6:27 Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-25 6:38 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-25 15:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-03 5:03 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-03 5:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-03 8:07 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-03 8:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-04 0:45 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-04 0:29 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-14 6:52 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-16 8:15 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-17 5:46 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-18 4:31 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-22 4:58 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-22 14:21 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-28 3:09 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-28 3:13 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-28 3:16 Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-12 21:53 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-23 3:56 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-23 12:25 ` Rusty Russell
2008-10-23 4:01 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-23 7:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-23 13:32 ` Rusty Russell
2008-10-23 4:12 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-23 5:16 ` Rusty Russell
2008-10-23 12:26 ` Rusty Russell
2008-10-23 12:50 ` Mike Travis
2008-10-24 2:21 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-27 3:32 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-28 2:55 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-28 7:19 ` Heiko Carstens
2008-10-28 7:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-29 4:28 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-29 4:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-29 22:42 ` Rusty Russell
2008-11-07 5:01 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-14 4:13 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-14 4:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-14 4:30 ` David Miller
2008-11-14 4:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-14 4:41 ` David Miller
2008-11-14 5:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-14 6:42 ` David Miller
2008-11-15 22:32 ` Rusty Russell
2008-11-17 2:57 ` David Miller
2008-11-20 3:24 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-20 4:28 ` Rusty Russell
2008-11-24 3:20 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-15 6:15 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-16 5:29 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-22 6:32 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-22 7:58 ` Rusty Russell
2008-12-22 8:45 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-01-04 23:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-05 4:36 ` Greg KH
2009-01-05 5:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 7:47 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 8:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 7:51 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-05 3:32 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-05 6:57 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-05 12:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-06 8:51 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-06 9:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-06 13:13 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-06 13:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-06 14:21 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-06 14:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-07 2:46 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-05 15:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-06 1:04 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-06 15:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-07 2:47 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-07 16:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-07 17:20 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-07 19:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-08 20:48 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-08 20:50 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-08 21:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-08 21:49 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-08 22:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-08 22:25 ` David Miller
2009-01-09 14:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-09 22:54 ` David Miller
2009-01-05 19:46 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-05 8:41 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-06 3:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-06 13:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-06 3:11 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-09 1:53 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-09 1:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200806251833.21248.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.