From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:21:11 +0200 From: Adrian Reber To: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: starting with 2.6.26-rc1 cell_defconfig fails on QS22 Message-ID: <20080626072111.GA4412@lisas.de> References: <20080623094539.GA16685@lisas.de> <200806240945.33255.jk@ozlabs.org> <20080624122929.GA10666@lisas.de> <132766c4280d49d0cef076e7444f6f11@kernel.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <132766c4280d49d0cef076e7444f6f11@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jeremy Kerr List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 05:59:33PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> D'oh. I spent so much time and the solution is so easy. >> >> Thanks everybody. I have updated to binutils-2.18.50.0.6-2.ppc and now >> it works again on QS22 and JS21. > > So I checked your binary, and the only differences between working and > not-working are a) some section offsets in the file, and b) the load > address of the segment (0 vs. 0xc000...). > > a) should be harmless, and b) likely is a binutils bug that got fixed. > > What is the exact binutils version you used for the non-working? Should I had two old Fedora installations. Both installations have been updated, but looking at the installation tree it must have been something like 2.16.91.0.6 and 2.17.50.0.3 > we test for it in our Makefile? If we require 2.18, we can drop the tests > for 2.12 and 2.14 ;-) Adrian