From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 ACPI: normalize segment descriptor register on resume Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:29:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20080626082943.GC10973@elte.hu> References: <200806242303.49498.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080624214610.GC18679@elf.ucw.cz> <20080625170126.GA2482@elte.hu> <200806252217.27059.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080626011716.e8c412dd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:40541 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754027AbYFZIaM (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:30:12 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080626011716.e8c412dd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Machek , Len Brown , ACPI Devel Maling List , LKML , pm list * Andrew Morton wrote: > Len seems to think that Rafael seems to think that Ingo seems to think > that this patch broke one of his boxes. > > Is it so? No! :-) it found a pre-existing suspend+resume breakage on a testbox. (I.e. the debug patch worked as i'd expect it to work. Every good debug patch starts its lifetime with a sharp spike of breakages it finds.) ( my kernel test-setup does in excess of 100,000 random kernel bootups per year and me not having to hit the keyboard or close+open the lid a hundred thousand times, day and night, to find the occasional suspend+resume regression is a not to be under-estimated plus. ) Ingo