From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 ACPI: normalize segment descriptor register on resume Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:51:10 +0200 Message-ID: <20080626085110.GA18599@elte.hu> References: <200806242303.49498.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080626011716.e8c412dd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080626082943.GC10973@elte.hu> <200806261040.00646.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:52334 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751848AbYFZIw0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:52:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200806261040.00646.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Andrew Morton , Pavel Machek , Len Brown , ACPI Devel Maling List , LKML , pm list * Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, 26 of June 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > Len seems to think that Rafael seems to think that Ingo seems to think > > > that this patch broke one of his boxes. > > > > > > Is it so? > > > > No! :-) > > > > it found a pre-existing suspend+resume breakage on a testbox. (I.e. > > the debug patch worked as i'd expect it to work. Every good debug > > patch starts its lifetime with a sharp spike of breakages it finds.) > > Does it mean that the $subject patch doesn't break your test box after > all? it doesnt break it - i get the same suspend+resume breakage without that patch as well, if i do it manually. Ingo