From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752800AbYFZKF1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:05:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753923AbYFZKFP (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:05:15 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:50331 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753047AbYFZKFN (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:05:13 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:04:57 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Yinghai Lu , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: remove end_pfn in 64bit Message-ID: <20080626100457.GC19573@elte.hu> References: <200806242213.15310.yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> <200806242214.09503.yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> <20080625154138.GC18796@elte.hu> <4862B915.3010001@goop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4862B915.3010001@goop.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: >> * Yinghai Lu wrote: >> >> >>> and use max_pfn directly. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu >>> >> >> applied to tip/x86/setup-memory - thanks Yinghai. I have picked up >> these patches: >> >> Ingo Molnar (1): >> Merge branch 'x86/setup-memory' >> >> Yinghai Lu (6): >> x86: fix e820_update_range size when overlapping >> x86: get max_pfn_mapped in init_memory_mapping >> x86: add table_top check for alloc_low_page in 64 bit >> x86: change size if e820_update/remove_range >> x86: numa 32 using apicid_2_node to get node for logical_apicid >> x86: remove end_pfn in 64bit >> > > Did you CC: this to me to indicate that "x86_64: replace end_pfn with > num_physpages" conflicts massively with this patch? Fortunately I > don't depend on it, so I don't mind much. yeah, wanted to notify you, in case you were wondering about interaction in this area :) Ingo