From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@qumranet.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] kvm mmu notifier
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:11:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080626181115.GM14329@duo.random> (raw)
Hello,
this is the mmu notifier patch for kvm updated according to last
comments.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@qumranet.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
index 8d45fab..ce3251c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ config KVM
tristate "Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) support"
depends on HAVE_KVM
select PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS
+ select MMU_NOTIFIER
select ANON_INODES
---help---
Support hosting fully virtualized guest machines using hardware
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 1fd8e3b..2749de7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -653,6 +653,98 @@ static void rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, u64 gfn)
account_shadowed(kvm, gfn);
}
+static int kvm_unmap_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp)
+{
+ u64 *spte;
+ int need_tlb_flush = 0;
+
+ while ((spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, NULL))) {
+ BUG_ON(!(*spte & PT_PRESENT_MASK));
+ rmap_printk("kvm_rmap_unmap_hva: spte %p %llx\n", spte, *spte);
+ rmap_remove(kvm, spte);
+ set_shadow_pte(spte, shadow_trap_nonpresent_pte);
+ need_tlb_flush = 1;
+ }
+ return need_tlb_flush;
+}
+
+int kvm_unmap_hva(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long hva)
+{
+ int i;
+ int need_tlb_flush = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * If mmap_sem isn't taken, we can look the memslots with only
+ * the mmu_lock by skipping over the slots with userspace_addr == 0.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < kvm->nmemslots; i++) {
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot = &kvm->memslots[i];
+ unsigned long start = memslot->userspace_addr;
+ unsigned long end;
+
+ /* mmu_lock protects userspace_addr */
+ if (!start)
+ continue;
+
+ end = start + (memslot->npages << PAGE_SHIFT);
+ if (hva >= start && hva < end) {
+ gfn_t gfn_offset = (hva - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ need_tlb_flush |= kvm_unmap_rmapp(kvm,
+ &memslot->rmap[gfn_offset]);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return need_tlb_flush;
+}
+
+static int kvm_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp)
+{
+ u64 *spte;
+ int young = 0;
+
+ spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, NULL);
+ while (spte) {
+ int _young;
+ u64 _spte = *spte;
+ BUG_ON(!(_spte & PT_PRESENT_MASK));
+ _young = _spte & PT_ACCESSED_MASK;
+ if (_young) {
+ young = 1;
+ clear_bit(PT_ACCESSED_SHIFT, (unsigned long *)spte);
+ }
+ spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, spte);
+ }
+ return young;
+}
+
+int kvm_age_hva(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long hva)
+{
+ int i;
+ int young = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * If mmap_sem isn't taken, we can look the memslots with only
+ * the mmu_lock by skipping over the slots with userspace_addr == 0.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < kvm->nmemslots; i++) {
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot = &kvm->memslots[i];
+ unsigned long start = memslot->userspace_addr;
+ unsigned long end;
+
+ /* mmu_lock protects userspace_addr */
+ if (!start)
+ continue;
+
+ end = start + (memslot->npages << PAGE_SHIFT);
+ if (hva >= start && hva < end) {
+ gfn_t gfn_offset = (hva - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ young |= kvm_age_rmapp(kvm, &memslot->rmap[gfn_offset]);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return young;
+}
+
#ifdef MMU_DEBUG
static int is_empty_shadow_page(u64 *spt)
{
@@ -1199,6 +1291,7 @@ static int nonpaging_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t v, int write, gfn_t gfn)
int r;
int largepage = 0;
pfn_t pfn;
+ int mmu_seq;
down_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
if (is_largepage_backed(vcpu, gfn & ~(KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE-1))) {
@@ -1206,6 +1299,8 @@ static int nonpaging_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t v, int write, gfn_t gfn)
largepage = 1;
}
+ mmu_seq = atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_notifier_seq);
+ /* implicit mb(), we'll read before PT lock is unlocked */
pfn = gfn_to_pfn(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
up_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
@@ -1216,6 +1311,11 @@ static int nonpaging_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t v, int write, gfn_t gfn)
}
spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
+ if (unlikely(atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_notifier_count)))
+ goto out_unlock;
+ smp_rmb();
+ if (unlikely(atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_notifier_seq) != mmu_seq))
+ goto out_unlock;
kvm_mmu_free_some_pages(vcpu);
r = __direct_map(vcpu, v, write, largepage, gfn, pfn,
PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL);
@@ -1223,6 +1323,11 @@ static int nonpaging_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t v, int write, gfn_t gfn)
return r;
+
+out_unlock:
+ spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
+ kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
+ return 0;
}
@@ -1341,6 +1446,7 @@ static int tdp_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gpa,
int r;
int largepage = 0;
gfn_t gfn = gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ int mmu_seq;
ASSERT(vcpu);
ASSERT(VALID_PAGE(vcpu->arch.mmu.root_hpa));
@@ -1354,6 +1460,8 @@ static int tdp_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gpa,
gfn &= ~(KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE-1);
largepage = 1;
}
+ mmu_seq = atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_notifier_seq);
+ /* implicit mb(), we'll read before PT lock is unlocked */
pfn = gfn_to_pfn(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
up_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
if (is_error_pfn(pfn)) {
@@ -1361,12 +1469,22 @@ static int tdp_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gpa,
return 1;
}
spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
+ if (unlikely(atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_notifier_count)))
+ goto out_unlock;
+ smp_rmb();
+ if (unlikely(atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_notifier_seq) != mmu_seq))
+ goto out_unlock;
kvm_mmu_free_some_pages(vcpu);
r = __direct_map(vcpu, gpa, error_code & PFERR_WRITE_MASK,
largepage, gfn, pfn, kvm_x86_ops->get_tdp_level());
spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
return r;
+
+out_unlock:
+ spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
+ kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
+ return 0;
}
static void nonpaging_free(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -1666,6 +1784,8 @@ static void mmu_guess_page_from_pte_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
gfn &= ~(KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE-1);
vcpu->arch.update_pte.largepage = 1;
}
+ vcpu->arch.update_pte.mmu_seq = atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_notifier_seq);
+ /* implicit mb(), we'll read before PT lock is unlocked */
pfn = gfn_to_pfn(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
up_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
index 4d91822..38f81c4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -263,6 +263,12 @@ static void FNAME(update_pte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *page,
pfn = vcpu->arch.update_pte.pfn;
if (is_error_pfn(pfn))
return;
+ if (unlikely(atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_notifier_count)))
+ return;
+ smp_rmb();
+ if (unlikely(atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_notifier_seq) !=
+ vcpu->arch.update_pte.mmu_seq))
+ return;
kvm_get_pfn(pfn);
mmu_set_spte(vcpu, spte, page->role.access, pte_access, 0, 0,
gpte & PT_DIRTY_MASK, NULL, largepage, gpte_to_gfn(gpte),
@@ -380,6 +386,7 @@ static int FNAME(page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
int r;
pfn_t pfn;
int largepage = 0;
+ int mmu_seq;
pgprintk("%s: addr %lx err %x\n", __func__, addr, error_code);
kvm_mmu_audit(vcpu, "pre page fault");
@@ -413,6 +420,8 @@ static int FNAME(page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
largepage = 1;
}
}
+ mmu_seq = atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_notifier_seq);
+ /* implicit mb(), we'll read before PT lock is unlocked */
pfn = gfn_to_pfn(vcpu->kvm, walker.gfn);
up_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
@@ -424,6 +433,11 @@ static int FNAME(page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
}
spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
+ if (unlikely(atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_notifier_count)))
+ goto out_unlock;
+ smp_rmb();
+ if (unlikely(atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_notifier_seq) != mmu_seq))
+ goto out_unlock;
kvm_mmu_free_some_pages(vcpu);
shadow_pte = FNAME(fetch)(vcpu, addr, &walker, user_fault, write_fault,
largepage, &write_pt, pfn);
@@ -439,6 +453,11 @@ static int FNAME(page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
return write_pt;
+
+out_unlock:
+ spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
+ kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
+ return 0;
}
static gpa_t FNAME(gva_to_gpa)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t vaddr)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 0fbc032..73430c0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/mman.h>
#include <linux/highmem.h>
+#include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/msr.h>
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/kvm_host.h b/include/asm-x86/kvm_host.h
index c64d124..8547544 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/kvm_host.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
#include <linux/kvm.h>
#include <linux/kvm_para.h>
@@ -251,6 +252,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
gfn_t gfn; /* presumed gfn during guest pte update */
pfn_t pfn; /* pfn corresponding to that gfn */
int largepage;
+ int mmu_seq;
} update_pte;
struct i387_fxsave_struct host_fx_image;
@@ -450,6 +452,9 @@ void kvm_mmu_set_base_ptes(u64 base_pte);
void kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes(u64 user_mask, u64 accessed_mask,
u64 dirty_mask, u64 nx_mask, u64 x_mask);
+#define KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER
+int kvm_unmap_hva(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long hva);
+int kvm_age_hva(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long hva);
int kvm_mmu_reset_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm, int slot);
void kvm_mmu_zap_all(struct kvm *kvm);
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index d220b49..a79aaa0 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -121,6 +121,12 @@ struct kvm {
struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev *coalesced_mmio_dev;
struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_ring *coalesced_mmio_ring;
#endif
+
+#ifdef KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER
+ struct mmu_notifier mmu_notifier;
+ atomic_t mmu_notifier_seq;
+ atomic_t mmu_notifier_count;
+#endif
};
/* The guest did something we don't support. */
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index f9427e2..ac719df 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -186,6 +186,136 @@ void kvm_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_uninit);
+#if defined(CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER) && defined(KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER)
+static inline struct kvm *mmu_notifier_to_kvm(struct mmu_notifier *mn)
+{
+ return container_of(mn, struct kvm, mmu_notifier);
+}
+
+static void kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_page(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
+ struct mm_struct *mm,
+ unsigned long address)
+{
+ struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
+ int need_tlb_flush;
+
+ /*
+ * When ->invalidate_page runs, the linux pte has been zapped
+ * already but the page is still allocated until
+ * ->invalidate_page returns. So if we increase the sequence
+ * here the kvm page fault will notice if the spte can't be
+ * established because the page is going to be freed. If
+ * instead the kvm page fault establishes the spte before
+ * ->invalidate_page runs, kvm_unmap_hva will release it
+ * before returning.
+
+ * No need of memory barriers as the sequence increase only
+ * need to be seen at spin_unlock time, and not at spin_lock
+ * time.
+ *
+ * Increasing the sequence after the spin_unlock would be
+ * unsafe because the kvm page fault could then establish the
+ * pte after kvm_unmap_hva returned, without noticing the page
+ * is going to be freed.
+ */
+ atomic_inc(&kvm->mmu_notifier_seq);
+ spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ need_tlb_flush = kvm_unmap_hva(kvm, address);
+ spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+ /* we've to flush the tlb before the pages can be freed */
+ if (need_tlb_flush)
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+
+}
+
+static void kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
+ struct mm_struct *mm,
+ unsigned long start,
+ unsigned long end)
+{
+ struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
+ int need_tlb_flush = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * The count increase must become visible at unlock time as no
+ * spte can be established without taking the mmu_lock and
+ * count is also read inside the mmu_lock critical section.
+ */
+ atomic_inc(&kvm->mmu_notifier_count);
+
+ spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ for (; start < end; start += PAGE_SIZE)
+ need_tlb_flush |= kvm_unmap_hva(kvm, start);
+ spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+ /* we've to flush the tlb before the pages can be freed */
+ if (need_tlb_flush)
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+}
+
+static void kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
+ struct mm_struct *mm,
+ unsigned long start,
+ unsigned long end)
+{
+ struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
+ /*
+ *
+ * This sequence increase will notify the kvm page fault that
+ * the page that is going to be mapped in the spte could have
+ * been freed.
+ *
+ * There's also an implicit mb() here in this comment,
+ * provided by the last PT lock taken to zap pagetables, and
+ * that the read side has to take too in follow_page(). The
+ * sequence increase in the worst case will become visible to
+ * the kvm page fault after the spin_lock of the last PT lock
+ * of the last PT-lock-protected critical section preceeding
+ * invalidate_range_end. So if the kvm page fault is about to
+ * establish the spte inside the mmu_lock, while we're freeing
+ * the pages, it will have to backoff and when it retries, it
+ * will have to take the PT lock before it can check the
+ * pagetables again. And after taking the PT lock it will
+ * re-establish the pte even if it will see the already
+ * increased sequence number before calling gfn_to_pfn.
+ */
+ atomic_inc(&kvm->mmu_notifier_seq);
+ /*
+ * The sequence increase must be visible before count
+ * decrease. The page fault has to read count before sequence
+ * for this write order to be effective.
+ */
+ wmb();
+ atomic_dec(&kvm->mmu_notifier_count);
+ BUG_ON(atomic_read(&kvm->mmu_notifier_count) < 0);
+}
+
+static int kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
+ struct mm_struct *mm,
+ unsigned long address)
+{
+ struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
+ int young;
+
+ spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ young = kvm_age_hva(kvm, address);
+ spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+ if (young)
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+
+ return young;
+}
+
+static const struct mmu_notifier_ops kvm_mmu_notifier_ops = {
+ .invalidate_page = kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_page,
+ .invalidate_range_start = kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start,
+ .invalidate_range_end = kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end,
+ .clear_flush_young = kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young,
+};
+#endif /* CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER && KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER */
+
static struct kvm *kvm_create_vm(void)
{
struct kvm *kvm = kvm_arch_create_vm();
@@ -206,6 +336,21 @@ static struct kvm *kvm_create_vm(void)
(struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_ring *)page_address(page);
#endif
+#if defined(CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER) && defined(KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER)
+ {
+ int err;
+ kvm->mmu_notifier.ops = &kvm_mmu_notifier_ops;
+ err = mmu_notifier_register(&kvm->mmu_notifier, current->mm);
+ if (err) {
+#ifdef KVM_COALESCED_MMIO_PAGE_OFFSET
+ put_page(page);
+#endif
+ kfree(kvm);
+ return ERR_PTR(err);
+ }
+ }
+#endif
+
kvm->mm = current->mm;
atomic_inc(&kvm->mm->mm_count);
spin_lock_init(&kvm->mmu_lock);
@@ -266,6 +411,9 @@ static void kvm_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
if (kvm->coalesced_mmio_ring != NULL)
free_page((unsigned long)kvm->coalesced_mmio_ring);
#endif
+#if defined(CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER) && defined(KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER)
+ mmu_notifier_unregister(&kvm->mmu_notifier, kvm->mm);
+#endif
kvm_arch_destroy_vm(kvm);
mmdrop(mm);
}
This is the kvm-userland compatibility bit to build against old
kernels without mmu notifier.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@qumranet.com>
diff --git a/kernel/include-compat/linux/mmu_notifier.h b/kernel/include-compat/linux/mmu_notifier.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a6db4ba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/include-compat/linux/mmu_notifier.h
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+#ifndef _LINUX_MMU_NOTIFIER_H
+#define _LINUX_MMU_NOTIFIER_H
+
+struct mmu_notifier {};
+
+#endif
next reply other threads:[~2008-06-26 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-26 18:11 Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2008-06-27 22:43 ` [PATCH] kvm mmu notifier Marcelo Tosatti
2008-06-28 1:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-07-03 15:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-07-04 17:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080626181115.GM14329@duo.random \
--to=andrea@qumranet.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.