diff for duplicates of <20080627081309.GA11284@linux-sh.org>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index a8d9b57..e18ff69 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -23,8 +23,3 @@ On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:35:18AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
 Yes, kdump should remain EXPERIMENTAL on SH for the time being. It's only
 been tested on a tiny subset of CPUs, and will need additional work for
 the rest (as with kexec for that matter).
-
-_______________________________________________
-kexec mailing list
-kexec@lists.infradead.org
-http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 71e7ee7..94bde72 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@
  "Date\0Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:13:09 +0900\0"
  "To\0Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>\0"
  "Cc\0Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>"
-  kexec@lists.infradead.org
   Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
+  kexec@lists.infradead.org
  " linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
@@ -37,11 +37,6 @@
  "> \n"
  "Yes, kdump should remain EXPERIMENTAL on SH for the time being. It's only\n"
  "been tested on a tiny subset of CPUs, and will need additional work for\n"
- "the rest (as with kexec for that matter).\n"
- "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "kexec mailing list\n"
- "kexec@lists.infradead.org\n"
- http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
+ the rest (as with kexec for that matter).
 
-2be32fdb78b9ac3d4e10cacc0c485ce867f41a274e52c897a5bf76837e236290
+c5b7fb15b0dff34c0e60ab750c508b89c551feb9802541f3ebb2803f1c4443a6
