All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:30:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080627083053.GC6562@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080627161347.0af905fb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>


* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Jens,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a trivial conflict in 
> include/asm-x86/smp.h between commit 
> a4c81cf684350797939416c99effb9d3ae46bca6 ("x86: extend e820 ealy_res 
> support 32bit") from the x86 tree and commit 
> 3b16cf874861436725c43ba0b68bdd799297be7c ("x86: convert to generic 
> helpers for IPI function calls") from the block tree.
> 
> A case of contextually close deletions.

Jens, would it be possible for you to prepare a pullable branch for us 
for the x86 and generic bits of the SMP generic helpers thing - 
independent of any block tree bits? (it can touch generic code but it 
should not break the build on other architectures)

That way we could pull it into tip/x86 and give it some testing on the 
x86 side, and resolve its integration effects. Would that be possible?

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-27  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-27  6:13 linux-next: manual merge of the block tree Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-27  8:30 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-06-27  8:47   ` Jens Axboe
2008-06-27  9:26     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-27  9:57       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-27 10:11         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-27 11:21           ` Jens Axboe
2008-06-27 11:21         ` Jens Axboe
2008-06-27 11:18       ` Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-10-25 15:03 linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 15:03 ` linux-next: manual merge of the block tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-14 14:48 linux-next: Tree for Oct 14 Thierry Reding
2013-10-14 14:48 ` linux-next: manual merge of the block tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-11 19:04 Mark Brown
2013-10-01 11:03 linux-next: Tree for Oct 1 Thierry Reding
2013-10-01 11:07 ` linux-next: manual merge of the block tree Thierry Reding
2013-09-30 11:26 linux-next: manual merge of the bcon tree Thierry Reding
2013-09-30 11:26 ` linux-next: manual merge of the block tree Thierry Reding
2008-12-15  7:08 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-19  3:21 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-19  9:14 ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-19  9:32   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-07  6:14 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-07  6:10 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-07  9:50 ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-07 10:07   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-15  7:40 Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-05  6:12 Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-05  6:22 ` Jens Axboe
2008-09-05 13:58   ` James Bottomley
2008-09-03  5:58 Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-03  5:55 Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-02  6:06 Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-02  5:59 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-28  5:30 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-27  5:48 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-27  5:47 Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-27  6:09 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080627083053.GC6562@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.