From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 09/30] sched: fix sched_domain aggregation
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:41:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080627115211.408635538@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20080627114109.724249622@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: sched-fair-smp-lb.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 12770 bytes --]
Keeping the aggregate on the first cpu of the sched domain has two problems:
- it could collide between different sched domains on different cpus
- it could slow things down because of the remote accesses
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1
kernel/sched.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
kernel/sched_fair.c | 12 ++---
3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6-2/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-2.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6-2/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -766,7 +766,6 @@ struct sched_domain {
struct sched_domain *child; /* bottom domain must be null terminated */
struct sched_group *groups; /* the balancing groups of the domain */
cpumask_t span; /* span of all CPUs in this domain */
- int first_cpu; /* cache of the first cpu in this domain */
unsigned long min_interval; /* Minimum balance interval ms */
unsigned long max_interval; /* Maximum balance interval ms */
unsigned int busy_factor; /* less balancing by factor if busy */
Index: linux-2.6-2/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-2.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6-2/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1539,12 +1539,12 @@ static int task_hot(struct task_struct *
*/
static inline struct aggregate_struct *
-aggregate(struct task_group *tg, struct sched_domain *sd)
+aggregate(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
{
- return &tg->cfs_rq[sd->first_cpu]->aggregate;
+ return &tg->cfs_rq[cpu]->aggregate;
}
-typedef void (*aggregate_func)(struct task_group *, struct sched_domain *);
+typedef void (*aggregate_func)(struct task_group *, int, struct sched_domain *);
/*
* Iterate the full tree, calling @down when first entering a node and @up when
@@ -1552,14 +1552,14 @@ typedef void (*aggregate_func)(struct ta
*/
static
void aggregate_walk_tree(aggregate_func down, aggregate_func up,
- struct sched_domain *sd)
+ int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
{
struct task_group *parent, *child;
rcu_read_lock();
parent = &root_task_group;
down:
- (*down)(parent, sd);
+ (*down)(parent, cpu, sd);
list_for_each_entry_rcu(child, &parent->children, siblings) {
parent = child;
goto down;
@@ -1567,7 +1567,7 @@ down:
up:
continue;
}
- (*up)(parent, sd);
+ (*up)(parent, cpu, sd);
child = parent;
parent = parent->parent;
@@ -1579,8 +1579,8 @@ up:
/*
* Calculate the aggregate runqueue weight.
*/
-static
-void aggregate_group_weight(struct task_group *tg, struct sched_domain *sd)
+static void
+aggregate_group_weight(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
{
unsigned long rq_weight = 0;
unsigned long task_weight = 0;
@@ -1591,15 +1591,15 @@ void aggregate_group_weight(struct task_
task_weight += tg->cfs_rq[i]->task_weight;
}
- aggregate(tg, sd)->rq_weight = rq_weight;
- aggregate(tg, sd)->task_weight = task_weight;
+ aggregate(tg, cpu)->rq_weight = rq_weight;
+ aggregate(tg, cpu)->task_weight = task_weight;
}
/*
* Compute the weight of this group on the given cpus.
*/
-static
-void aggregate_group_shares(struct task_group *tg, struct sched_domain *sd)
+static void
+aggregate_group_shares(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
{
unsigned long shares = 0;
int i;
@@ -1607,18 +1607,18 @@ void aggregate_group_shares(struct task_
for_each_cpu_mask(i, sd->span)
shares += tg->cfs_rq[i]->shares;
- if ((!shares && aggregate(tg, sd)->rq_weight) || shares > tg->shares)
+ if ((!shares && aggregate(tg, cpu)->rq_weight) || shares > tg->shares)
shares = tg->shares;
- aggregate(tg, sd)->shares = shares;
+ aggregate(tg, cpu)->shares = shares;
}
/*
* Compute the load fraction assigned to this group, relies on the aggregate
* weight and this group's parent's load, i.e. top-down.
*/
-static
-void aggregate_group_load(struct task_group *tg, struct sched_domain *sd)
+static void
+aggregate_group_load(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
{
unsigned long load;
@@ -1630,17 +1630,17 @@ void aggregate_group_load(struct task_gr
load += cpu_rq(i)->load.weight;
} else {
- load = aggregate(tg->parent, sd)->load;
+ load = aggregate(tg->parent, cpu)->load;
/*
* shares is our weight in the parent's rq so
* shares/parent->rq_weight gives our fraction of the load
*/
- load *= aggregate(tg, sd)->shares;
- load /= aggregate(tg->parent, sd)->rq_weight + 1;
+ load *= aggregate(tg, cpu)->shares;
+ load /= aggregate(tg->parent, cpu)->rq_weight + 1;
}
- aggregate(tg, sd)->load = load;
+ aggregate(tg, cpu)->load = load;
}
static void __set_se_shares(struct sched_entity *se, unsigned long shares);
@@ -1649,8 +1649,8 @@ static void __set_se_shares(struct sched
* Calculate and set the cpu's group shares.
*/
static void
-__update_group_shares_cpu(struct task_group *tg, struct sched_domain *sd,
- int tcpu)
+__update_group_shares_cpu(struct task_group *tg, int cpu,
+ struct sched_domain *sd, int tcpu)
{
int boost = 0;
unsigned long shares;
@@ -1677,8 +1677,8 @@ __update_group_shares_cpu(struct task_gr
* \Sum rq_weight
*
*/
- shares = aggregate(tg, sd)->shares * rq_weight;
- shares /= aggregate(tg, sd)->rq_weight + 1;
+ shares = aggregate(tg, cpu)->shares * rq_weight;
+ shares /= aggregate(tg, cpu)->rq_weight + 1;
/*
* record the actual number of shares, not the boosted amount.
@@ -1698,15 +1698,15 @@ __update_group_shares_cpu(struct task_gr
* task went to.
*/
static void
-__move_group_shares(struct task_group *tg, struct sched_domain *sd,
+__move_group_shares(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd,
int scpu, int dcpu)
{
unsigned long shares;
shares = tg->cfs_rq[scpu]->shares + tg->cfs_rq[dcpu]->shares;
- __update_group_shares_cpu(tg, sd, scpu);
- __update_group_shares_cpu(tg, sd, dcpu);
+ __update_group_shares_cpu(tg, cpu, sd, scpu);
+ __update_group_shares_cpu(tg, cpu, sd, dcpu);
/*
* ensure we never loose shares due to rounding errors in the
@@ -1722,19 +1722,19 @@ __move_group_shares(struct task_group *t
* we need to walk up the tree and change all shares until we hit the root.
*/
static void
-move_group_shares(struct task_group *tg, struct sched_domain *sd,
+move_group_shares(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd,
int scpu, int dcpu)
{
while (tg) {
- __move_group_shares(tg, sd, scpu, dcpu);
+ __move_group_shares(tg, cpu, sd, scpu, dcpu);
tg = tg->parent;
}
}
-static
-void aggregate_group_set_shares(struct task_group *tg, struct sched_domain *sd)
+static void
+aggregate_group_set_shares(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
{
- unsigned long shares = aggregate(tg, sd)->shares;
+ unsigned long shares = aggregate(tg, cpu)->shares;
int i;
for_each_cpu_mask(i, sd->span) {
@@ -1742,20 +1742,20 @@ void aggregate_group_set_shares(struct t
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
- __update_group_shares_cpu(tg, sd, i);
+ __update_group_shares_cpu(tg, cpu, sd, i);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
}
- aggregate_group_shares(tg, sd);
+ aggregate_group_shares(tg, cpu, sd);
/*
* ensure we never loose shares due to rounding errors in the
* above redistribution.
*/
- shares -= aggregate(tg, sd)->shares;
+ shares -= aggregate(tg, cpu)->shares;
if (shares) {
- tg->cfs_rq[sd->first_cpu]->shares += shares;
- aggregate(tg, sd)->shares += shares;
+ tg->cfs_rq[cpu]->shares += shares;
+ aggregate(tg, cpu)->shares += shares;
}
}
@@ -1763,21 +1763,21 @@ void aggregate_group_set_shares(struct t
* Calculate the accumulative weight and recursive load of each task group
* while walking down the tree.
*/
-static
-void aggregate_get_down(struct task_group *tg, struct sched_domain *sd)
+static void
+aggregate_get_down(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
{
- aggregate_group_weight(tg, sd);
- aggregate_group_shares(tg, sd);
- aggregate_group_load(tg, sd);
+ aggregate_group_weight(tg, cpu, sd);
+ aggregate_group_shares(tg, cpu, sd);
+ aggregate_group_load(tg, cpu, sd);
}
/*
* Rebalance the cpu shares while walking back up the tree.
*/
-static
-void aggregate_get_up(struct task_group *tg, struct sched_domain *sd)
+static void
+aggregate_get_up(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
{
- aggregate_group_set_shares(tg, sd);
+ aggregate_group_set_shares(tg, cpu, sd);
}
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, aggregate_lock);
@@ -1790,18 +1790,18 @@ static void __init init_aggregate(void)
spin_lock_init(&per_cpu(aggregate_lock, i));
}
-static int get_aggregate(struct sched_domain *sd)
+static int get_aggregate(int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
{
- if (!spin_trylock(&per_cpu(aggregate_lock, sd->first_cpu)))
+ if (!spin_trylock(&per_cpu(aggregate_lock, cpu)))
return 0;
- aggregate_walk_tree(aggregate_get_down, aggregate_get_up, sd);
+ aggregate_walk_tree(aggregate_get_down, aggregate_get_up, cpu, sd);
return 1;
}
-static void put_aggregate(struct sched_domain *sd)
+static void put_aggregate(int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
{
- spin_unlock(&per_cpu(aggregate_lock, sd->first_cpu));
+ spin_unlock(&per_cpu(aggregate_lock, cpu));
}
static void cfs_rq_set_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, unsigned long shares)
@@ -1815,12 +1815,12 @@ static inline void init_aggregate(void)
{
}
-static inline int get_aggregate(struct sched_domain *sd)
+static inline int get_aggregate(int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
{
return 0;
}
-static inline void put_aggregate(struct sched_domain *sd)
+static inline void put_aggregate(int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
{
}
#endif
@@ -3604,7 +3604,7 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, st
cpus_setall(*cpus);
- unlock_aggregate = get_aggregate(sd);
+ unlock_aggregate = get_aggregate(this_cpu, sd);
/*
* When power savings policy is enabled for the parent domain, idle
@@ -3743,7 +3743,7 @@ out_one_pinned:
ld_moved = 0;
out:
if (unlock_aggregate)
- put_aggregate(sd);
+ put_aggregate(this_cpu, sd);
return ld_moved;
}
@@ -7337,7 +7337,6 @@ static int __build_sched_domains(const c
SD_INIT(sd, ALLNODES);
set_domain_attribute(sd, attr);
sd->span = *cpu_map;
- sd->first_cpu = first_cpu(sd->span);
cpu_to_allnodes_group(i, cpu_map, &sd->groups, tmpmask);
p = sd;
sd_allnodes = 1;
@@ -7348,7 +7347,6 @@ static int __build_sched_domains(const c
SD_INIT(sd, NODE);
set_domain_attribute(sd, attr);
sched_domain_node_span(cpu_to_node(i), &sd->span);
- sd->first_cpu = first_cpu(sd->span);
sd->parent = p;
if (p)
p->child = sd;
@@ -7360,7 +7358,6 @@ static int __build_sched_domains(const c
SD_INIT(sd, CPU);
set_domain_attribute(sd, attr);
sd->span = *nodemask;
- sd->first_cpu = first_cpu(sd->span);
sd->parent = p;
if (p)
p->child = sd;
@@ -7372,7 +7369,6 @@ static int __build_sched_domains(const c
SD_INIT(sd, MC);
set_domain_attribute(sd, attr);
sd->span = cpu_coregroup_map(i);
- sd->first_cpu = first_cpu(sd->span);
cpus_and(sd->span, sd->span, *cpu_map);
sd->parent = p;
p->child = sd;
@@ -7385,7 +7381,6 @@ static int __build_sched_domains(const c
SD_INIT(sd, SIBLING);
set_domain_attribute(sd, attr);
sd->span = per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, i);
- sd->first_cpu = first_cpu(sd->span);
cpus_and(sd->span, sd->span, *cpu_map);
sd->parent = p;
p->child = sd;
Index: linux-2.6-2/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-2.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ linux-2.6-2/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1403,11 +1403,11 @@ load_balance_fair(struct rq *this_rq, in
/*
* empty group
*/
- if (!aggregate(tg, sd)->task_weight)
+ if (!aggregate(tg, this_cpu)->task_weight)
continue;
- rem_load = rem_load_move * aggregate(tg, sd)->rq_weight;
- rem_load /= aggregate(tg, sd)->load + 1;
+ rem_load = rem_load_move * aggregate(tg, this_cpu)->rq_weight;
+ rem_load /= aggregate(tg, this_cpu)->load + 1;
this_weight = tg->cfs_rq[this_cpu]->task_weight;
busiest_weight = tg->cfs_rq[busiest_cpu]->task_weight;
@@ -1425,10 +1425,10 @@ load_balance_fair(struct rq *this_rq, in
if (!moved_load)
continue;
- move_group_shares(tg, sd, busiest_cpu, this_cpu);
+ move_group_shares(tg, this_cpu, sd, busiest_cpu, this_cpu);
- moved_load *= aggregate(tg, sd)->load;
- moved_load /= aggregate(tg, sd)->rq_weight + 1;
+ moved_load *= aggregate(tg, this_cpu)->load;
+ moved_load /= aggregate(tg, this_cpu)->rq_weight + 1;
rem_load_move -= moved_load;
if (rem_load_move < 0)
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-27 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-27 11:41 [PATCH 00/30] SMP-group balancer - take 3 Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 01/30] sched: clean up some unused variables Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 02/30] sched: revert the revert of: weight calculations Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-30 18:07 ` Balbir Singh
2008-07-15 20:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 03/30] sched: fix calc_delta_asym() Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 04/30] sched: fix calc_delta_asym Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 05/30] sched: revert revert of: fair-group: SMP-nice for group scheduling Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 06/30] sched: sched_clock_cpu() based cpu_clock() Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 07/30] sched: fix wakeup granularity and buddy granularity Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 08/30] sched: add full schedstats to /proc/sched_debug Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 10/30] sched: update aggregate when holding the RQs Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 11/30] sched: kill task_group balancing Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 12/30] sched: dont micro manage share losses Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 13/30] sched: no need to aggregate task_weight Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 14/30] sched: simplify the group load balancer Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 15/30] sched: fix newidle smp group balancing Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 16/30] sched: fix sched_balance_self() " Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 17/30] sched: persistent average load per task Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 18/30] sched: hierarchical load vs affine wakeups Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 19/30] sched: hierarchical load vs find_busiest_group Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 20/30] sched: fix load scaling in group balancing Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 21/30] sched: fix task_h_load() Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 22/30] sched: remove prio preference from balance decisions Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 23/30] sched: optimize effective_load() Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 24/30] sched: disable source/target_load bias Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 25/30] sched: fix shares boost logic Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 26/30] sched: update shares on wakeup Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 27/30] sched: fix mult overflow Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 28/30] sched: correct wakeup weight calculations Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 29/30] sched: incremental effective_load() Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 30/30] sched: bias effective_load() error towards failing wake_affine() Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 12:46 ` [PATCH 00/30] SMP-group balancer - take 3 Ingo Molnar
2008-06-27 17:33 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-06-28 17:08 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-06-30 12:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-30 14:53 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-07-01 10:57 ` Dhaval Giani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080627115211.408635538@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.