From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Dan Magenheimer" Subject: RE: PVM guests and p[yv]grub and the extra= parameter Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:42:43 -0600 Message-ID: <20080702114243296.00000003744@djm-pc> References: <20080702172956.GV4714@implementation.uk.xensource.com> Reply-To: "dan.magenheimer@oracle.com" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080702172956.GV4714@implementation.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Samuel Thibault Cc: "Xen-Devel (E-mail)" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > That however doesn't look very appealing to me, on > the principles. I agree that would be a bit of a hack. > Instead, would for instance being able to set the menu > entry to be activated by default be ok? That would be nice too, but doesn't replace the niceness of being able to alter the booting behavior of a pv guest without ever mucking with grub interactive edits or grub configuration files. Thanks, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Samuel Thibault [mailto:samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 11:30 AM > To: Dan Magenheimer > Cc: Xen-Devel (E-mail) > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] PVM guests and p[yv]grub and the extra=3D > parameter > = > = > Dan Magenheimer, le Wed 02 Jul 2008 11:17:45 -0600, a =E9crit : > > At Xen Summit, Ian's presentation touched on PVGrub which is > > intended to be a more secure replacement for PyGrub. > > > > I've noticed that PyGrub doesn't honor the extra=3D parameter > > in a VM config file (which adds additional kernel command line > > parameters, e.g. extra=3D1 will boot single-user mode). > > > > Will PVGrub? > = > Mmm, actually in PVGrub extra is used to point to the = > menu.lst file that > should be loaded. It could however append the remainder of = > extra to the > kernel command line. That however doesn't look very = > appealing to me, on > the principles. Instead, would for instance being able to = > set the menu > entry to be activated by default be ok? > = > Samuel >