From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>, Pekka Paalanen <pq@iki.fi>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 08:26:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080703062657.GA26365@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080703161236.368d7926.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kmemcheck tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/mm/Makefile between commit
> ff3a3e9ba5e4273a8bc10570adab4a390fb90757 ("x86 mmiotrace: move files
> into arch/x86/mm/") from the ftrace tree and commit
> 385e31b9eae0528bada07d16a189f3f40df23961 ("kmemcheck: add the
> kmemcheck core") from the kmemcheck tree.
>
> Just overlapping additions.
thanks Stephen. These are the conflict resolutions i've been carrying
for a few months:
Merge branch 'kmemcheck' into auto-latest
Conflicts:
arch/x86/mm/Makefile
include/asm-x86/pgtable.h
kernel/sysctl.c
the arch/x86/mm/Makefile and kernel/sysctl.c ones are trivial - but the
pgtable.h is non-trivial: you might want to glean the resolution out of
tip/auto-latest.
Shortly before the release of a stable kernel is the 'maximum dynamic
pressure' point of the launch of the next Linux version - this is when
the highest number of conflicts arise. [ And i hope these three are not
too bad to break the rocket apart ;-) ]
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-03 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-03 6:12 linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-03 6:26 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-03 6:19 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-11 6:32 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-21 6:47 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-22 6:16 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-22 6:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-22 8:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-28 4:01 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-28 9:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-28 9:17 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-28 9:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-28 4:09 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-28 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-28 17:19 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-13 5:22 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-13 5:26 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-13 5:29 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-13 7:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-13 7:31 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-08-13 7:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-13 8:14 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-08-13 8:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-13 11:37 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-08-13 11:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-13 11:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-08-13 12:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-13 7:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-15 6:45 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-15 6:43 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-08-15 8:17 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] <20080815164909.3d8beb10.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
2008-08-15 7:04 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-15 8:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-20 6:40 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-21 5:15 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-21 5:29 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-21 7:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-21 8:07 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-10-21 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-28 5:14 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-28 8:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 12:14 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-30 12:18 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080703062657.GA26365@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=pq@iki.fi \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.