From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cezary Jackiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ACPI: compal-laptop: use rfkill switch subsystem Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 06:48:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20080703064818.35ee2532@debian> References: <20080702214524.2ba4a001@debian> <20080703021433.GC20410@khazad-dum.debian.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:45180 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752260AbYGCEsZ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 00:48:25 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so258363fgg.17 for ; Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:48:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080703021433.GC20410@khazad-dum.debian.net> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Cc: ak@linux.intel.com, Len Brown , Richard Purdie , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Dnia 2008-07-02, o godz. 23:14:33 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh napisa=B3(a): [...] > That doesn't look like a new-style (i.e. what is in net-next-2.6) rfk= ill > support. Could you take a look on the new (and I sure hope, vastly > improved) Documentation/rfkill.txt in net-next-2.6, and switch the dr= iver to > RFKILL_STATE_UNBLOCKED, RFKILL_STATE_SOFT_BLOCKED, etc? After a quic= k look, > it looks like Compal won't need RFKILL_STATE_HARD_BLOCKED (thinkpad-= acpi > does, because some thinkpads have a master wireless kill switch), but > still... Compal has hardware wireless kill switch (without software it kill all = radios rf and disconnecting bluetooth from usb bus). Does he should generate SW_RFKILL_ALL or something like this? --=20 Cezary Jackiewicz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html