From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cezary Jackiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ACPI: compal-laptop: use rfkill switch subsystem Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:05:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20080703070528.2f0603a5@debian> References: <20080702214524.2ba4a001@debian> <20080703021433.GC20410@khazad-dum.debian.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]:3291 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754732AbYGCFFf convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 01:05:35 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so259876fgg.17 for ; Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:05:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080703021433.GC20410@khazad-dum.debian.net> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Cc: linux-netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ivo van Doorn , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Dnia 2008-07-02, o godz. 23:14:33 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh napisa=B3(a): > BTW, it is a good idea to Cc linux-wireless on rfkill patches, and yo= u > *really* should be CCing the rfkill maintainer on any patches dealing= with > rfkill IMHO. That way, you get more reviews, rfkill isn't (unfortuna= tely) > easy to use. Is there any reason why rfkill_unregister switches off radio rather tha= n=20 leaving it in the current status? --=20 Cezary Jackiewicz =20 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html