From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Cc: ak@linux.intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Julia Jomantaite <julia.jomantaite@gmail.com>,
marcus@better.se, dannybaumann@web.de, corsac@debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI Video: Ignore devices that aren't present in hardware
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 17:16:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080703161643.GB29110@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200807031815.13291.trenn@suse.de>
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 06:15:11PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Thursday 03 July 2008 18:08:22 Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 06:05:51PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > > Can these two go to linux-next or -mm, pls.
> >
> > Not until the opregion code is merged, no.
> Why?
Because it's entirely plausible that it'll break existing systems.
> Try the next patch, it works for the T61.
> These IGD parts could take quite a while still, while Toshibas and others
> remain broken (and T61 poke on wrong hardware which could cause
> all kind of badness).
The code's written and works, it just has a 750ms latency for reasons I
don't understand.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-03 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-03 16:05 [PATCH 1/2] ACPI Video: Ignore devices that aren't present in hardware Thomas Renninger
2008-07-03 16:08 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-07-03 16:15 ` Thomas Renninger
2008-07-03 16:16 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2008-07-03 16:21 ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2008-07-03 19:24 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-07-04 10:08 ` Thomas Renninger
2008-07-04 10:18 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-07-04 3:09 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-04 9:13 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-07-04 11:55 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-04 17:39 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-07-04 19:49 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-05 15:46 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080703161643.GB29110@srcf.ucam.org \
--to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corsac@debian.org \
--cc=dannybaumann@web.de \
--cc=julia.jomantaite@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcus@better.se \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.