From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.linux-foundation.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9477CDDECF for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 12:03:40 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 19:02:20 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Tony Breeds Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11027] New: random forward time jumps Message-Id: <20080703190220.a92d02fa.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080704015022.GV20457@bakeyournoodle.com> References: <20080702110614.4bd45cce.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1215132417.7849.2.camel@localhost> <20080703175932.53ec7151.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080704015022.GV20457@bakeyournoodle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Bligh , anton@samba.org, Martin List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:50:22 +1000 Tony Breeds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 05:59:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Nope, the only account matching .*ppc.* and .*power.* is > > platform_ppc-32@kernel-bugs.osdl.org. (I have elevated bugzilla perms > > so I can can query the users list) (everyone should have this - it's > > handy). > > > > There is a category "Platform Specific/Hardware"/PPC-64. Those go to > > anton@samba.org. > > Can you get this changed to platform_ppc-64@kernel-bugs.osdl.org > (obvisouly this'll need to be created)? > > > There is a category "Platform Specific/Hardware"/PPC-62. Those go to > > platform_ppc-32@kernel-bugs.osdl.org. > > > > So setting a watch on both those accounts would suit. > > Then the linuxppc-dev "person" can watch both of them. Seems slightly > more "offical". > > > Or you can just ignore it all. I screen all bugzilla reports and will > > ensure that suitable people know about them. > > Yeah we could but it'd be easier for you if we didn't :) > umm, Martin, can you please advise?