From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_KMOD needs to be default y
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 23:03:25 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807082303.26194.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080708124208.GA6704@infradead.org>
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 22:42:08 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 01:49:31PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > Far too many people configure their kernel without CONFIG_KMOD
> > and then complain that wireless breaks, thanks to Herbert Xu for
> > pointing me to this.
> >
> > This patch makes CONFIG_KMOD default to "y" and adds a warning
> > that people should not turn it off.
>
> What about just killing the config option entirely? It' basically
> guarding a ~50 lines function + a sysctl variable. I think having
> modules but not CONFIG_KMOD is entirely unreasonable.
I agree with Christoph here.
But as a patch series please: it's spread pretty wide. eg. first make it a
non-prompting CONFIG option, then remove the users, then finally kill it.
Some existing request_module users might be able to use
try_then_request_module, too...
Thanks!
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-08 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-08 11:49 [PATCH] CONFIG_KMOD needs to be default y Johannes Berg
2008-07-08 12:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-08 13:03 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2008-07-08 16:06 ` Johannes Berg
2008-07-08 16:15 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200807082303.26194.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomasw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.