From: Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@dfki.de>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] better git-submodule status output
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:13:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080709101330.GA3525@joyeux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080701150119.GE5852@joyeux>
Here is a (tentative) summary of the whole discussion:
* doing fetch in status is EVIL. Therefore, status should only report
whatever information is available.
* nonetheless, having a "peek" mode seem to be accepted as a useful
feature not only by me.
* changing the output format of git-submodules is not right either,
because it would break existing tools which parses it at the moment.
Proposal
- remove fetch from status, and make the new output enabled when
--verbose is set (can also be set in the config file I guess).
On the symbols side, I propose:
> submodule commit is a direct descendant of the commit in the
superproject
< submodule commit is a direct ancestor of the commit in the
superproject
+ no direct relation between submodule commit and commit in the
superproject
? the commit in the superproject cannot be found in the submodule
(replaces the initial '!' in my patch)
A 'M' is appended if the submodule has uncommitted changes
- define a git-submodule 'fetch' subcommand which call fetch in each
submodule and runs the verbose mode of git-status (can be disabled by
a --quiet option).
Comments ? (I'm sure there are some ...)
Sylvain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-09 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-01 15:01 [PATCH] better git-submodule status output Sylvain Joyeux
2008-07-06 6:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-06 12:57 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-06 16:07 ` Sylvain Joyeux
2008-07-06 16:29 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-07 6:21 ` Sylvain Joyeux
2008-07-07 14:25 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-07-07 14:34 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-07 14:37 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-07 14:57 ` Sylvain Joyeux
2008-07-07 15:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-07 15:42 ` Sylvain Joyeux
2008-07-07 18:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-07 18:29 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-07-07 19:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-08 8:00 ` Sylvain Joyeux
2008-07-08 11:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-08 12:22 ` Sylvain Joyeux
2008-07-08 13:00 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-08 13:12 ` Sylvain Joyeux
2008-07-07 14:57 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-07-07 15:23 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-07 15:36 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-07-07 16:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-07 15:52 ` Sylvain Joyeux
2008-07-07 15:00 ` Sylvain Joyeux
2008-07-06 13:14 ` Mark Levedahl
2008-07-09 10:13 ` Sylvain Joyeux [this message]
2008-07-09 10:25 ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-07-09 11:01 ` Sylvain Joyeux
2008-07-09 12:31 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-09 13:46 ` Sylvain Joyeux
2008-07-09 13:54 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-09 18:48 ` Junio C Hamano
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-01 14:57 Sylvain Joyeux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080709101330.GA3525@joyeux \
--to=sylvain.joyeux@dfki.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.