From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Timothy Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] simplify xfs_setattr
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 18:29:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080709162914.GA16308@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48747DAD.7060501@sgi.com>
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 06:58:21PM +1000, Timothy Shimmin wrote:
> > - if (ia_valid & (ATTR_MTIME_SET | ATTR_ATIME_SET))
> > - flags |= ATTR_UTIME;
> > -#ifdef ATTR_NO_BLOCK
> > - if ((ia_valid & ATTR_NO_BLOCK))
> > - flags |= ATTR_NONBLOCK;
> > -#endif
> > -
>
> So this code looks different.
> We are now dropping the flags. Why is that?
> Presumably because we were mapping ia_valid's:
> ATTR_MTIME_SET or ATTR_ATIME_SET --> ATTR_UTIME
> ATTR_NO_BLOCK -> ATTR_NONBLOCK
> But now we pass ATTR_?TIME_SET and ATTR_NO_BLOCK straight thru.
> So previously we didn't map them onto va_mask bits but as separate flags
> instead.
Yeah, not that ATTR_NO_BLOCK doesn't actually exist in any tree I have
access to, and thus it's not actually handled in the new xfs_setattr.
> So we get rid of the test for XFS_AT_NOSET.
> where:
> #define XFS_AT_NOSET (XFS_AT_NLINK|XFS_AT_RDEV|XFS_AT_FSID|XFS_AT_NODEID|\
> XFS_AT_TYPE|XFS_AT_BLKSIZE|XFS_AT_NBLOCKS|XFS_AT_VCODE|\
> XFS_AT_NEXTENTS|XFS_AT_ANEXTENTS|XFS_AT_GENCOUNT)
>
> I can't see anywhere we set any of these.
> Presumably out of the xattr calls.
> Some left over from IRIX I guess.
Probably. Note that linux uses the ATTR_ flags only for ->setattr so
there are per defintion none that can't be set.
> #define XFS_AT_UPDATIME 0x00010000
> #define XFS_AT_UPDMTIME 0x00020000
> #define XFS_AT_UPDCTIME 0x00040000
> 3 more not supported by vfs ATTR_* macros.
> I can't see where we set any of these.
> So no loss there I guess.
> Presumably they were just for IRIX.
It's an IRIX leftover. I will submit a patch to introduce something
similar to Linux for 2.6.27, that's why I'd like these patches in for
2.6.26 so that I have a clean base to start from.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-09 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-27 15:45 [PATCH 2/3] simplify xfs_setattr Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-05 17:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-09 8:58 ` Timothy Shimmin
2008-07-09 16:29 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-07-11 0:32 ` Timothy Shimmin
2008-07-11 1:07 ` Dave Chinner
2008-07-11 1:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-11 1:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080709162914.GA16308@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=tes@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.