From: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Release status - things to be done
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:12:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080710131258.796c2e1b@siona.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080705230540.22A8C248AC@gemini.denx.de>
[removing my private e-mail address from Cc]
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:05:40 +0200
Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> wrote:
> 2582 05/21 Haavard Skinnemoe [PATCH] MMC: Consolidate MMC/SD command definitions
> -> Rejected, needs to be rebased
I see you applied v2 instead -- good. Please ignore v1 as it was posted
before the big whitespace cleanup.
> 2584 05/21 Haavard Skinnemoe [PATCH] Remove kharris at nexus-tech.net from MAINTAINERS
> -> asked submitter for fixes / cleanup
I'll send you a new patch later today...if I can find the original
commit.
> 3648 06/11 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support
> 3649 06/11 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support
> 3650 06/11 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support
> 3651 06/11 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support
> 3652 06/11 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 5/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support
> 3653 06/11 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support
> 3654 06/11 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] SDHC Support for AT572d940HF-EB
> 3733 06/12 "Ulf Samuelsson" Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] SDHC Support for AT572d940HF-EB
> 3735 06/12 "COSTA, Antonio" Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] SDHC Support for AT572d940HF-EB
> 3737 06/12 "Ulf Samuelsson" Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] SDHC Support for AT572d940HF-EB
> 3739 06/12 Jerry Van Baren Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] SDHC Support for AT572d940HF-EB
> 3859 06/15 Haavard Skinnemoe Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] SDHC Support for AT572d940HF-EB
> 3897 06/16 Ken.Fuchs at bench.c Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] SDHC Support for AT572d940HF-EB
> 3899 06/17 Haavard Skinnemoe Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] SDHC Support for AT572d940HF-EB
> 3740 06/12 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (board folder)
> 3741 06/12 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/2] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (SDHC support part 2)
> 3742 06/12 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (SDHC support part 1)
> 3743 06/12 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (include files part 1)
> 3744 06/12 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 5/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (ethernet files)
> 3745 06/12 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (include files part 2)
> 3747 06/12 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (cpu folder)
> 3748 06/12 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (configuration files)
> 3746 06/12 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] mmc_verbosity variable
> 3764 06/12 Haavard Skinnemoe Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (SDHC support part 1)
> -> still under discussion; who is reponsible?
I think Jean-Christophe should be responsible for most of this, but I
obviously want to be kept in the loop with the MMC/SD/SDHC stuff and
possibly other stuff that is or ought to be shared with avr32.
Now that the MMC driver has been moved into drivers/mmc, I'd really
like to see a patch with the minimum amount of changes needed to make
the driver work on AT91 and AT57 as well. With that in place, we'll
have a great baseline to add new features like SDHC and MMC+ support,
and the rest of the AT57 board support can be merged independently.
Haavard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-10 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-05 23:05 [U-Boot-Users] Release status - things to be done Wolfgang Denk
2008-07-06 5:24 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2008-07-06 7:17 ` Ben Warren
2008-07-06 7:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-07-07 2:54 ` Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2008-07-07 6:13 ` Ben Warren
2008-07-06 9:00 ` Magnus Lilja
2008-07-06 10:51 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2008-07-06 11:28 ` Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2008-07-07 9:05 ` Stefan Roese
2008-07-07 9:37 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-07-07 9:50 ` Stefan Roese
2008-07-07 10:21 ` Stefan Roese
2008-07-07 18:18 ` Scott Wood
2008-07-07 14:28 ` John Rigby
2008-07-07 15:03 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-07-07 14:32 ` Scott Wood
2008-07-07 18:23 ` Jon Loeliger
2008-07-07 18:55 ` Kim Phillips
2008-07-07 20:30 ` Rune Torgersen
2008-07-07 20:41 ` Rune Torgersen
2008-07-09 23:34 ` Anatolij Gustschin
2008-07-10 11:12 ` Haavard Skinnemoen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-09 19:46 Liew Tsi Chung
2008-07-09 21:02 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080710131258.796c2e1b@siona.local \
--to=haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.