From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.174]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0F9DDE18 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:57:35 +1000 (EST) From: Arnd Bergmann To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: latencytop support for powerpc? Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:57:22 +0200 References: <48755237.9070701@nortel.com> In-Reply-To: <48755237.9070701@nortel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200807101557.22354.arnd@arndb.de> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday 10 July 2008, Chris Friesen wrote: > Just wondering if anyone has looked at what it would take to support > latency top on powerpc? Just guessing something like the patch below, not more that that, but without the bugs ;-). Haven't tested at all, so it will probably fall apart, but give it a try if you like. Subject: powerpc: support for latencytop Implement save_stack_trace_tsk on powerpc, so that we can run with latencytop. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig index ff5217a..b1fd369 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ config STACKTRACE_SUPPORT bool default y +config HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT + def_bool y + config TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT bool depends on PPC64 diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c index 9861f17..2b8c14d 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c @@ -10,19 +10,18 @@ * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. */ +#include #include #include #include +#include /* * Save stack-backtrace addresses into a stack_trace buffer. */ -void save_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace) +static void save_context_stack(struct stack_trace *trace, unsigned long sp, + struct task_struct *tsk, int savesched) { - unsigned long sp; - - asm("mr %0,1" : "=r" (sp)); - for (;;) { unsigned long *stack = (unsigned long *) sp; unsigned long newsp, ip; @@ -33,10 +32,12 @@ void save_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace) newsp = stack[0]; ip = stack[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE]; - if (!trace->skip) - trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ip; - else - trace->skip--; + if (savesched || !in_sched_functions(ip)) { + if (!trace->skip) + trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ip; + else + trace->skip--; + } if (trace->nr_entries >= trace->max_entries) return; @@ -44,4 +45,19 @@ void save_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace) sp = newsp; } } + +void save_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace) +{ + unsigned long sp; + + asm("mr %0,1" : "=r" (sp)); + + save_context_stack(trace, sp, current, 1); +} EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(save_stack_trace); + +void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace) +{ + save_context_stack(trace, tsk->thread.regs->gpr[1], tsk, 0); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(save_stack_trace_tsk);