From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: powerpc/cell/cpufreq: add spu aware cpufreq governor Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:05:08 +0200 Message-ID: <200807102305.08752.arnd@arndb.de> References: <200807071702.31240.arnd@arndb.de> <20080708152728.GF4997@codemonkey.org.uk> <20080710180553.GB13890@isilmar.linta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080710180553.GB13890@isilmar.linta.de> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Cc: Dave Jones , Stephen Rothwell , cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, Dominik Brodowski , Jeremy Kerr , cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org On Thursday 10 July 2008, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > Actually, "cpufreq-set -g spu_governor" should be enough. (BTW, do we really > want this name?) Do you have a better suggestion for the name? I don't think there was a particularly strong reason to choose it over something else. Arnd <><