From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Roese Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:30:21 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] CPU PPC440x5 on Virtex5 FX In-Reply-To: <4233.7021-17386-1090292077-1215778165@seznam.cz> References: <4233.7021-17386-1090292077-1215778165@seznam.cz> Message-ID: <200807111430.21562.sr@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Friday 11 July 2008, Michal Simek wrote: > Some days ago a sent to mailing list patch (currently is in) where I rename > CONFIG_XILINX_ML300 -> CONFIG_XILINX_405. > > I would like to see if you can use the same style for 440 -> > CONFIG_XILINX_440. I have no detail information about ppc440 but IMHO only > virtex5 fx (or whatever) support it -> make no sense to me use virtex5 in > name. > > SR: Do you agree with me? Yes, renaming this to CONFIG_XILINX_440 is a good idea. > There is big part of code relate with interrupt controller which is the > same with microblaze. This should be handled in the same way. Any > suggestion? (Do generic driver?) Yes, I already mentioned in my review, that this code should go into a separate file. If the microblaze implementation is the same or very similar then please use the same code here and move to to a common directory. Perhaps: drivers/interrupt/xilinx.c ? Comments? > M > > BTW: some comments in code. Michal, your comments are very hard to spot since you don't quote the original code by "> ". Best regards, Stefan ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de =====================================================================