From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.168]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498AADE05A for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:18:16 +1000 (EST) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so4038866wfg.15 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:18:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:18:13 -0600 From: Grant Likely To: Anton Vorontsov Subject: Re: [PATCH] of/i2c: don't pass -1 to irq_dispose_mapping, otherwise kernel will oops Message-ID: <20080711211813.GC18239@secretlab.ca> References: <20080711174859.GA24260@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <4877B046.8070206@scram.de> <20080711191930.GA23723@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20080711191930.GA23723@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> Sender: Grant Likely Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:19:30PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 09:11:02PM +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote: > > > > Shouldn't this be: > > if (info.irq != NO_IRQ) > > Maybe, maybe not. See > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/211 > > I.e. maybe we should use "if (irq)". Or if we should use NO_IRQ, then we > need to fixup all the users of .irq. Yes, these are definitely wrong and need to be fixed. g.