From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.26-rc7: BUG at kernel/power/snapshot.c:493
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:47:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807112247.44530.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080711204023.GE6843@elf.ucw.cz>
On Friday, 11 of July 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2008-07-11 22:33:52, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, 11 of July 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > > > Anyone else seeing this? Happened after resuming from s2both (from
> > > > > > disk)...
> > > > >
> > > > > At what point exactly did it happen?
> > > >
> > > > I am attaching the full dmesg.
> > >
> > > Something is seriously wrong here.
> > >
> > > > usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid
> > > > usbhid: v2.6:USB HID core driver
> > > > TCP cubic registered
> > > > NET: Registered protocol family 10
> > > > lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions
> > > > Mobile IPv6
> > > > NET: Registered protocol family 17
> > > > NET: Registered protocol family 15
> > > > Using IPI No-Shortcut mode
> > > > RAMDISK: ext2 filesystem found at block 0
> > > > RAMDISK: Loading 2000KiB [1 disk] into ram disk... |\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\b/\b-\b\\b|\bdone.
>
> (1)
> > > > EXT2-fs warning: checktime reached, running e2fsck is recommended
> (2)
> > > > VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem).
> > > > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > kernel BUG at kernel/power/snapshot.c:493!
> > > > invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> > > > Modules linked in:
> > >
> > > This is _after_ we mounted filesystems... we should not be resuming at
> > > this point.
> >
> > This is an initrd, isn't it?
>
> Does not look like so: it mounted some filesystem at (1), and
> checktime is reached. I thought initrd is read-only RAM disk -- it
> should not reach check time, no?
Yes, it will reach the check time if it's ext2 (which is the case).
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-11 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-27 16:43 2.6.26-rc7: BUG at kernel/power/snapshot.c:493 Soeren Sonnenburg
2008-06-27 17:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-27 18:14 ` Soeren Sonnenburg
2008-06-27 19:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-11 19:54 ` Pavel Machek
2008-07-11 20:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-11 20:40 ` Pavel Machek
2008-07-11 20:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-07-09 13:08 ` Martin Michlmayr
2008-07-09 21:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-11 15:38 ` Martin Michlmayr
2008-07-11 19:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-15 12:44 ` Martin Michlmayr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200807112247.44530.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=kernel@nn7.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.