From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Dan Magenheimer" Subject: RE: Xen system skew MUCH worse than tsc skew (was RE: RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasinghvm guest time)) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 15:05:45 -0600 Message-ID: <20080712150545593.00000003744@djm-pc> References: Reply-To: "dan.magenheimer@oracle.com" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Pratt , Keir Fraser , "Xen-Devel (E-mail)" Cc: Dave Winchell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > Some NUMA systems have different oscillators on each node so you can't > rely on the frequency being identical. Such systems are fairly rare > (though their common use case is server virtualization). I guess a > command line option to enable independent calibration for = > these systems > would be OK, though it would obviously be better to start off assuming > the frequencies are identical, and then detect rate differences. = > = > Ian Good point. This is the way that Linux does it too, I think. Dan