All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
Cc: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rt2x00 is still experimental?
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:31:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807121731.57208.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200807121713.54123.IvDoorn@gmail.com>

On Saturday 12 July 2008 17:13:54 Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> On Saturday 12 July 2008, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > Quoting Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >> Can we please have rt2x00 drivers considered stable in Linux 2.6.27?
> > >
> > > No.
> > >
> > >> My experience running rt73 day by day with WPA on a very crowded network
> > >> shows that it's a pretty reliable driver already.
> > >
> > > Perhaps managed mode, but not adhoc mode, beaconing is still broken.
> > > In addition the leds are broken as well, and hardware encryption   
> > > isn't in either.
> > 
> > I see.  It must be a perception thing.  Things I hack on seem  
> > unstable, but things that just work seem stable :)
> 
> Well it is at least good to know managed mode is working well for you. :)
> 
> > Thank you for the status.  Good luck with fixing the remaining problems!
> 
> Thanks,

I think the EXPERIMENTAL flag is just meaningless.
You cannot run a kernel without it, as so many required and working
subsystems and drivers depend on it.
So I decided to drop EXPERIMENTAL for b43, as It Works (tm) for most users.
Sure, there are a lot of corners that need fixing, but fixing them all
up before removing EXPERIMENTAL would most likely never happen.

So we removed EXPERIMENTAL from the driver when the driver worked
for most users in STA mode. IMO that improves the overall situation,
as it's one less EXPERIMENTAL dependency, that isn't really one.

-- 
Greetings Michael.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-12 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-11 21:18 rt2x00 is still experimental? Pavel Roskin
2008-07-12  8:25 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-07-12 14:46   ` Pavel Roskin
2008-07-12 15:13     ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-07-12 15:31       ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2008-07-12 16:15         ` Stefanik Gábor
2008-07-12 22:07           ` Stefan Monnier
2008-07-14  7:56           ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200807121731.57208.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=proski@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.