From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Denys Fedoryshchenko Subject: Re: REDIRECT in nat OUTPUT Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:40:25 +0300 Message-ID: <200807121740.25789.denys@visp.net.lb> References: <200807120424.56462.denys@visp.net.lb> <20080712062812.GA7609@2ka.mipt.ru> <200807121655.44547.denys@visp.net.lb> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, David Miller , Eric Dumazet To: Evgeniy Polyakov Return-path: Received: from relay2.globalproof.net ([194.146.153.25]:44145 "EHLO relay2.globalproof.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753115AbYGLOkd (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:40:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200807121655.44547.denys@visp.net.lb> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Seems i found something. After issuing ethtool -K lo tso on i got significant performance improvement. Why it is not on by default? Without it performance is VERY poor. On Saturday 12 July 2008, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote: > There is nothing unusual on oprofile. And seems it is not CPU bottleneck, while i am doing tests it is not loaded 100% (i am using mpstat 1 -P ALL to measure that). > But i will show first significant lines, if you want i can give full oprofile output, but i dont think it's matter. -- ------ Technical Manager Virtual ISP S.A.L. Lebanon