From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Renninger Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Check whether ACPI graphics device is physically present Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:51:03 +0200 Message-ID: <200807141851.06003.trenn@suse.de> References: <1215700265-24908-1-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> <200807102106.27944.trenn@suse.de> <20080711090652.GC24714@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:40526 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752241AbYGNQvL (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:51:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080711090652.GC24714@srcf.ucam.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, rui.zhang@intel.com, jwoithe@physics.adelaide.edu.au, malattia@linux.it, corentincj@iksaif.net, mzxreary@0pointer.de, hmh@hmh.eng.br, carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, dannybaumann@web.de, marcus@better.se, corsac@debian.org On Friday 11 July 2008 11:06:52 Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 09:06:24PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > This one is needed also. > > Matthew made me a bit nervous about it,but to detect video capabilities > > it is necessary to know whether the ACPI graphics device is really there. > > The IGD problems should be solved now and this can be added, right? IMO > > it could have been added before also because the other patches took care > > about the reported regression. > > The patch is good, but the comment still indicates that you want to > force control over to thinkpad_acpi. We're not going to do that, so > either resend it without that inference or I can resend it when I get > back home next week. Yep, sorry for the long delay, something else seem to not work anymore since my last changes. I will repost soon. Thomas