From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KIqtu-0008Oa-8g for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:13:30 -0700 Received: from [198.99.130.12] (helo=saraswathi.solana.com) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1KIqtr-00058O-Mk for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:13:30 -0700 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:13:22 -0400 From: Jeff Dike Message-ID: <20080715201322.GA15836@c2.user-mode-linux.org> References: <1214488251-20927-1-git-send-email-bhalevy@panasas.com> <20080715162400.GC12154@c2.user-mode-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] fix extern inline errors with gcc 4.3.0 List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: David Shane Holden Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:42:05AM -0700, David Shane Holden wrote: > Jeff Dike wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:30:15AM -0700, David Shane Holden wrote: > >> I tried to build a UML 2.6.26 kernel on Debian (32-bit) and ran into the > >> same problem reported here http://marc.info/?t=121011533500002&r=1&w=2. > > > > It's really 2.6.26, and not something from a day or two earlier? I > > fixed the compilation bugs, supposedly, just before 2.6.26. > > Yeah, it's a vanilla 2.6.26, and when comparing it to 2.6.26-rc9 the > only difference in arch/um was the change for no-unit-at-a-time. OK, I misunderstood - I thought you were saying you got compilation errors, rather than crashes. Hence my incredulity, since that patch was supposed to fix the compile errors. > > > >> If I use gcc 4.3 everything works fine, but if I use gcc 4.1 or 4.2, > >> UML crashes on startup. > > > > If the crash says ptrace in it, then I'm currently trying to figure > > out what's happening with that. > > It's crashing in wait_stub_done just like the poster of the message was > having, it appears gcc 4.1 and 4.2 need -fno-unit-at-a-time. Well, we need to figure out why the initcalls aren't happening with -unit-at-a-time and some versions of gcc. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel