From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Dan Magenheimer" Subject: RE: PVM guests and p[yv]grub and the extra= parameter Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:18:33 -0600 Message-ID: <20080715221833578.00000080236@djm-pc> References: <20080716012804.GH5288@implementation> Reply-To: "dan.magenheimer@oracle.com" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080716012804.GH5288@implementation> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Samuel Thibault Cc: "Xen-Devel (E-mail)" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > > > Instead, would for instance being able to set the menu > > > entry to be activated by default be ok? > > > > That would be nice too, but doesn't replace the niceness > > of being able to alter the booting behavior of a pv guest > > without ever mucking with grub interactive edits or grub > > configuration files. > = > Another possibility would be to provide the menu.lst as a ramdisk. We > keep the confinment of grub inside the domain, but still provide full > configurability. That's a neat solution. Still not as clean as an extra=3D vm.cfg parameter though. (Think about instructing a novice user over the phone how to construct a grub.conf file from scratch!) But it's much better than the other alternatives. Dan