From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6GFAf3e020690 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:10:41 -0400 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com (e5.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.145]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6GFASgr009790 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:10:28 -0400 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6GFAM7p011876 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:10:22 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m6GFA5ho121028 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:10:05 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m6GFA57f009858 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:10:05 -0400 Received: from malahal.beaverton.ibm.com (malahal.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.17.130]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m6GFA4Rr009843 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:10:05 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:10:04 -0700 From: malahal@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Re: Split LV mirror or something Message-ID: <20080716151004.GA13989@us.ibm.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Stuart D. Gathman [stuart@bmsi.com] wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Levy Abinajm Melero Sant'Anna wrote: > > > > I have one LV with some critical data, and want to make a safe copy with > > > less time possible of downtime. Could I make one mirror on a new PV > > > (lvconvert -m1) and split this copy into a new LV or/and maybe split the VG > > > into a new VG? > > Why not take a snapshot, and copy that to an LV on new VG ? More over, this is a better approach than an LVM mirror in your case.