From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Baudis Subject: Re: Considering teaching plumbing to users harmful Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:59:30 +0200 Message-ID: <20080716185930.GP32184@machine.or.cz> References: <32541b130807161053w24a21d7bh1fa800a714ce75db@mail.gmail.com> <7v7iblsnfh.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <32541b130807161151x19c20f9t91b7fb9b8c7b8c7b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org To: Avery Pennarun X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jul 16 21:00:40 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KJCEr-0002mA-8d for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:00:33 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754724AbYGPS7d (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:59:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754705AbYGPS7c (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:59:32 -0400 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:37561 "EHLO machine.or.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754531AbYGPS7c (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:59:32 -0400 Received: by machine.or.cz (Postfix, from userid 2001) id 4F8AB393B300; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:59:30 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <32541b130807161151x19c20f9t91b7fb9b8c7b8c7b@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:51:30PM -0400, Avery Pennarun wrote: > On 7/16/08, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > You can skip merges with "git log --no-merges", just in case you didn't > > know. > > Perhaps this is mostly a user education or documentation issue. I > know about --no-merges, but it's unclear that this is really a safe > thing to use, particularly if some of your merges have conflicts. > Leaving them out leaves out an important part of history. Do you use > this option yourself? Whereas if you rebase, not only you don't show the conflicts resolution, you didn't even _store_ it in the first place. That isn't much of an improvement. :-) (This is the main reason why I prefer to avoid rebase unless absolutely necessary for the workflow.) Petr "Pasky" Baudis