From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE05DDF4D for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:32:38 +1000 (EST) From: Arnd Bergmann To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: 82xx performance Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:32:17 +0200 References: <200807172143.57576.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200807172332.18030.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Milton Miller List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday 17 July 2008, Rune Torgersen wrote: > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > So again, nothing conclusive. I'm running out of ideas. > > Is the syscall path different or the same on ppc and powerpc? > Any differences in the task switching, irq handling or page fault > handling? > It's all different in suble ways, but those changes should only show up in the system time accounting, not user time accounting. One change that I would expect to show up in user space performance is different TLB management, in a way that causes increased flushing and reloading of page table entries. I don't have the slightest idea if or in what ways that has changed. Maybe Ben has a clue about this. Arnd <><