From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: maximum size of a block device in a domU Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:09:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20080722130950.GC4447@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <20080721113021.2329B522AD@smtp.l00-bugdead-prods.de> <7F0FB2108857B5449321AEA91CF47903185A7C225C@hkgmail01.lsi.com> <20080722092928.GA4447@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <7F0FB2108857B5449321AEA91CF47903185A7C2323@hkgmail01.lsi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7F0FB2108857B5449321AEA91CF47903185A7C2323@hkgmail01.lsi.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Jayaraman, Bhaskar" Cc: Sebastian Reitenbach , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Jayaraman, Bhaskar, le Tue 22 Jul 2008 20:14:01 +0800, a =E9crit : > I was actually referring to the equivalent of dedicating a PCI HBA to a= paravirtualized guest(using pciback) in an HVM guest. Ok, then there shouldn't be any limit. Samuel