From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rui.zhang@intel.com, harbour@sfinx.od.ua, pavel@ucw.cz,
rjw@sisk.pl
Subject: Re: + pm-introduce-new-interfaces-schedule_work_on-and-queue_work_on.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:19:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080722161900.GA17601@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080712162149.GD603@tv-sign.ru>
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 08:21:49PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> (Gautham cc'ed)
>
Sorry for the delay... I'm a bit tied down to other things until aug
20th :(
> On 07/11, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Subject: pm: introduce new interfaces schedule_work_on() and queue_work_on()
> > From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> >
> > This interface allows adding a job on a specific cpu.
> >
> > Although a work struct on a cpu will be scheduled to other cpu if the cpu
> > dies, there is a recursion if a work task tries to offline the cpu it's
> > running on. we need to schedule the task to a specific cpu in this case.
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10897
>
> So, this is used in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16707
>
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/power/poweroff.c 2008-06-30 16:01:35.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/power/poweroff.c 2008-07-03 10:50:05.000000000 +0800
> @@ -25,7 +25,8 @@
>
> static void handle_poweroff(int key, struct tty_struct *tty)
> {
> - schedule_work(&poweroff_work);
> + /* run sysrq poweroff on boot cpu */
> + schedule_work_on(first_cpu(cpu_online_map), &poweroff_work);
> }
>
> static struct sysrq_key_op sysrq_poweroff_op = {
>
> A couple of silly questions, I don't understand the low-level details.
>
> This patch (and kernel_power_off() afaics) assumes that the boot cpu
> can't be cpu_down()'ed. Is it true in general? For example, grep shows
> that arch/s390/kernel/smp.c:topology_init()->smp_add_present_cpu()
> sets ->hotpluggable = 1 for all present CPUs?
I tried this on a Power system sometime back and I was able to
offline CPU0. What I am not sure however, is
if that was the boot-cpu.
On x86, I do remember reading somewhere why we cannot offline
CPU0.
/me searches.
Yes, in arch/x86/kernel/topology.c
int __ref arch_register_cpu(int num)
{
/*
* CPU0 cannot be offlined due to several
* restrictions and assumptions in kernel. This basically
* doesnt add a control file, one cannot attempt to offline
* BSP.
*
* Also certain PCI quirks require not to enable hotplug control
* for all CPU's.
*/
if (num)
per_cpu(cpu_devices, num).cpu.hotpluggable = 1;
return register_cpu(&per_cpu(cpu_devices, num).cpu, num);
}
>
> Another question. I can't understand why first_cpu(cpu_online_map) is
> always the boot CPU on every arch. IOW, shouldn't boot_cpu_init() set
> some "boot_cpu = smp_processor_id()" which should be use instead of
> first_cpu(cpu_online_map) ?
>
Not very sure about this one.
> Thanks,
>
> Oleg.
>
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-22 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-11 18:40 + pm-introduce-new-interfaces-schedule_work_on-and-queue_work_on.patch added to -mm tree akpm
2008-07-12 15:32 ` [PATCH] pm-introduce-new-interfaces-schedule_work_on-and-queue_work_on-cleanup Oleg Nesterov
2008-07-12 15:35 ` [PATCH] workqueues: queue_work() can use queue_work_on() Oleg Nesterov
2008-07-12 15:45 ` [PATCH] workqueues: schedule_on_each_cpu() can use schedule_work_on() Oleg Nesterov
2008-07-12 16:21 ` + pm-introduce-new-interfaces-schedule_work_on-and-queue_work_on.patch added to -mm tree Oleg Nesterov
2008-07-22 16:19 ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2008-07-24 12:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-07-25 1:17 ` Zhang Rui
2008-07-25 9:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-08-05 19:57 ` Pavel Machek
2008-08-06 12:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080722161900.GA17601@in.ibm.com \
--to=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=harbour@sfinx.od.ua \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.