From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: latest tree build failure -- cpm uart & gpio
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:48:27 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080722204827.GA16227@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200807221233.16723.david-b@pacbell.net>
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:33:16PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2008, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 08:54:16AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > > can someone look at the following compile failure in linus's tree. I'm
> > > guessing part of this has to do with Alan's tty changes (and might
> > > already be addressed?).
> > >
> > > include/asm-generic/gpio.h:131: error: implicit declaration of function
> > > 'gpio_get_value'
> > > include/asm-generic/gpio.h:137: error: implicit declaration of function
> > > 'gpio_set_value'
> >
> > I think this patch should help:
> >
> > [OF] of_gpio: should use new <linux/gpio.h> header
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=18750
>
> Is that confirmed as fixing this, vs just being the Right Thing To Do?
Just applied the patch locally and the issue is not reproducible
anymore.
> > David, can you please Ack it? See Benjamin's mail:
> > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-July/060109.html
>
> If you like ... but this is an OF-specific change, making
> it conform with the interface spec, so I wouldn't expect
> this to need more approvals than it's already got.
>
> Acked-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Thanks.
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>,
linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: latest tree build failure -- cpm uart & gpio
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:48:27 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080722204827.GA16227@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200807221233.16723.david-b@pacbell.net>
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:33:16PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2008, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 08:54:16AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > > can someone look at the following compile failure in linus's tree. I'm
> > > guessing part of this has to do with Alan's tty changes (and might
> > > already be addressed?).
> > >
> > > include/asm-generic/gpio.h:131: error: implicit declaration of function
> > > 'gpio_get_value'
> > > include/asm-generic/gpio.h:137: error: implicit declaration of function
> > > 'gpio_set_value'
> >
> > I think this patch should help:
> >
> > [OF] of_gpio: should use new <linux/gpio.h> header
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=18750
>
> Is that confirmed as fixing this, vs just being the Right Thing To Do?
Just applied the patch locally and the issue is not reproducible
anymore.
> > David, can you please Ack it? See Benjamin's mail:
> > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-July/060109.html
>
> If you like ... but this is an OF-specific change, making
> it conform with the interface spec, so I wouldn't expect
> this to need more approvals than it's already got.
>
> Acked-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Thanks.
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-22 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-22 13:54 latest tree build failure -- cpm uart & gpio Kumar Gala
2008-07-22 13:54 ` Kumar Gala
2008-07-22 13:52 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-22 14:53 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-07-22 14:53 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-07-22 19:33 ` David Brownell
2008-07-22 19:33 ` David Brownell
2008-07-22 20:48 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2008-07-22 20:48 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-07-22 22:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-07-22 22:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-07-22 22:26 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-07-22 22:26 ` Anton Vorontsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080722204827.GA16227@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=kumar.gala@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.