From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rfkill: add default global states
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:28:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807232028.49239.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1216775046-9506-3-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br>
> #endif /* __RFKILL_INPUT_H */
> diff --git a/net/rfkill/rfkill.c b/net/rfkill/rfkill.c
> index 0a78e32..eaaabbd 100644
> --- a/net/rfkill/rfkill.c
> +++ b/net/rfkill/rfkill.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(default_state,
> "Default initial state for all radio types, 0 = radio off");
>
> static enum rfkill_state rfkill_states[RFKILL_TYPE_MAX];
> +static enum rfkill_state rfkill_default_states[RFKILL_TYPE_MAX];
> +static unsigned long rfkill_states_lockdflt[BITS_TO_LONGS(RFKILL_TYPE_MAX)];
I have a slight distaste for using multiple arrays where each variable is a different
variable for the same object. Perhaps it is time to move it into a structure:
struct .. {
enum rfkill_state current
enum rfkill_state default
};
static struct .. rfkill_states[RFKILL_TYPE_MAX];
It probably won't optimize anything, but I think it looks a bit nicer.
Just a suggestion, if it easier to keep it as multiple arrays I would still ack it. ;)
> list_add_tail(&rfkill->node, &rfkill_list);
> @@ -689,6 +737,49 @@ void rfkill_unregister(struct rfkill *rfkill)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rfkill_unregister);
>
> +/**
> + * rfkill_set_default - set initial value for a switch type
> + * @type - the type of switch to set the default state of
> + * @state - the new default state for that group of switches
> + *
> + * Sets the initial state rfkill should use for a given type. Only "soft"
> + * states are allowed, i.e. RFKILL_STATE_SOFT_BLOCKED and
> + * RFKILL_STATE_UNBLOCKED.
> + *
> + * This function is meant to be used by platform drivers for platforms that
> + * can save switch state across power down/reboot.
As sideinfo: I found a hardware bug in a broadcom rfkill key a few days ago
which would not work well with this function:
* laptop was powered on, HW rfkill was set to allow WiFi
* laptop halted, something about a missing power supply and a battery which was drained
without any userspace tool checking the battery status. ;)
* laptop was powered on and booted, HW rkfill decided to block WiFi.
In any case not really important for this patch, but just for information. ;)
> * Rfkill module initialization/deinitialization.
> */
> @@ -702,8 +793,8 @@ static int __init rfkill_init(void)
> rfkill_default_state != RFKILL_STATE_UNBLOCKED)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rfkill_states); i++)
> - rfkill_states[i] = rfkill_default_state;
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rfkill_default_states); i++)
> + rfkill_default_states[i] = rfkill_default_state;
rfkill_states[] is now no longer initialized, I guess that is a bad thing ;)
The rest of the patch looks good.
Ivo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-23 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-23 1:04 [GIT PATCH] RFC: next batch of rfkill changes Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 1:04 ` [PATCH] rfkill: detect bogus double-registering Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 3:41 ` Johannes Berg
2008-07-23 15:27 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 16:30 ` Johannes Berg
2008-07-23 17:41 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 18:12 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-07-23 1:04 ` [PATCH] rfkill: add default global states Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 18:28 ` Ivo van Doorn [this message]
2008-07-23 18:42 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 19:20 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-07-23 1:04 ` [PATCH] rfkill: add master_switch_mode functionality Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 18:39 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-07-23 19:37 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 1:04 ` [PATCH] rfkill: add EPO lock to rfkill-input Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 18:44 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-07-23 19:01 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 19:28 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-07-23 1:04 ` [PATCH] rfkill: rename rfkill_mutex to rfkill_global_mutex Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 18:44 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-07-23 1:04 ` [PATCH] rfkill: rate-limit rfkill-input workqueue usage Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 18:46 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-07-23 19:43 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-07-23 20:27 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 20:39 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-07-23 1:12 ` [GIT PATCH] RFC: next batch of rfkill changes Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 18:08 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-07-23 19:09 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-01 18:11 ` John W. Linville
2008-08-01 19:35 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200807232028.49239.IvDoorn@gmail.com \
--to=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.